ORDER OF DISMISSAL. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/4/12. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2012)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
No. C 12-1405 RMW (PR)
ORDER OF DISMISSAL
On March 20, 2012, Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a letter, which
commenced this action. The same day, the clerk notified plaintiff that he had not paid the filing
fee, nor had he filed a completed application to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). Along with
the deficiency notice, plaintiff was provided with a new IFP application, and instructions for
completing it. Plaintiff was cautioned that his failure to either file a completed IFP application
or pay the filing fee within thirty days would result in the dismissal of this action. To date,
plaintiff has not communicated with the court. Accordingly, the instant action is DISMISSED
without prejudice to plaintiff filing a new action in which he either pays the filing fee or files a
completed IFP application. The clerk shall enter judgment and close the file.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
Order of Dismissal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Case Number: CV12-01405 RMW
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on June 5, 2012, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said
copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing
said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery
receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
Ernesto Publer P-07758
California State Prison
A-5 AD Seg. 233-Seg
Los Angeles County
PO Box 4430
Lancaster, CA 93539
Dated: June 5, 2012
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?