Metcalfe v. State of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al

Filing 31

ORDER SOLICITING STATUS REPORT. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on February 15, 2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 RONALD METCALFE, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF ) CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION; ) SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON (“SVSP”)) WARDEN A. HEDGPETH; FORMER SVSP ) WARDEN M. EVANS; FORMER SVSP CHIEF ) DEPUTY WARDEN G. NEOTTI; FORMER ) SVSP CHIEF DEPUTY WARDEN G. LEWIS; ) CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY ) (“CTF”) WARDEN R. GROUNDS; FORMER ) CTF WARDEN(A) C. NOLL; and DOES 1 ) THROUGH 50 INCLUSIVE, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 5:12-CV-1445-LHK ORDER SOLICITING STATUS REPORT 21 The parties have submitted a joint case management statement in which the parties state 22 that they have engaged the services of a mediator and have scheduled the mediation for Friday, 23 February 15, 2013. The parties represent that should the case not settle on February 15, 2013, 24 Plaintiff will dismiss the federal lawsuit and re-file an action in state court. The parties are hereby 25 ORDERED to file a status report regarding their mediation by 11 a.m. on February 19, 2013. The 26 case management conference scheduled for February 20, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. remains as set. 27 28 1 Case No.: 12-CV-1445 ORDER SOLICITING STATUS REPORT 1 IT IS SO ORDERED. 2 3 February 15, 2013 Dated: February __, 2013 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-1445 ORDER SOLICITING STATUS REPORT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?