Metcalfe v. State of California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation, et al
Filing
31
ORDER SOLICITING STATUS REPORT. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on February 15, 2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/15/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
RONALD METCALFE,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF
)
CORRECTIONS & REHABILITATION;
)
SALINAS VALLEY STATE PRISON (“SVSP”))
WARDEN A. HEDGPETH; FORMER SVSP )
WARDEN M. EVANS; FORMER SVSP CHIEF )
DEPUTY WARDEN G. NEOTTI; FORMER
)
SVSP CHIEF DEPUTY WARDEN G. LEWIS; )
CORRECTIONAL TRAINING FACILITY
)
(“CTF”) WARDEN R. GROUNDS; FORMER )
CTF WARDEN(A) C. NOLL; and DOES 1
)
THROUGH 50 INCLUSIVE,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 5:12-CV-1445-LHK
ORDER SOLICITING STATUS
REPORT
21
The parties have submitted a joint case management statement in which the parties state
22
that they have engaged the services of a mediator and have scheduled the mediation for Friday,
23
February 15, 2013. The parties represent that should the case not settle on February 15, 2013,
24
Plaintiff will dismiss the federal lawsuit and re-file an action in state court. The parties are hereby
25
ORDERED to file a status report regarding their mediation by 11 a.m. on February 19, 2013. The
26
case management conference scheduled for February 20, 2013 at 2:00 p.m. remains as set.
27
28
1
Case No.: 12-CV-1445
ORDER SOLICITING STATUS REPORT
1
IT IS SO ORDERED.
2
3
February 15, 2013
Dated: February __, 2013
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-1445
ORDER SOLICITING STATUS REPORT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?