Banh et al v. U.S. Bank, N.A. et al

Filing 20

ORDER DISMISSING ACTION. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 7/24/2012. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 BRUCE GIAC TRUONG BANH; and LEHANG PHAM, Plaintiffs, 12 13 14 15 v. U.S. BANK, N.A.; and MORTGAGE ELECTRONIC REGISTRATION SYSTEMS, INC., Defendants. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO.: 12-CV-01446-LHK ORDER DISMISSING ACTION 17 On July 24, 2012, Plaintiffs filed a notice of dismissal. Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil 18 Procedure 41(a), a plaintiff may dismiss an action without a court order by filing “a notice of 19 dismissal before the opposing party serves either an answer or a motion for summary judgment.” 20 Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(i); see also Wilson v. City of San Jose, 111 F.3d 688, 692 (9th Cir. 21 1997) (“The dismissal is effective on filing [of a notice of dismissal] and no court order is 22 required.”). Here, Defendants have served neither an answer nor a motion for summary judgment. 23 Accordingly, this action is dismissed without prejudice. All parties shall bear their own costs and 24 fees. The Clerk shall close the file. 25 IT IS SO ORDERED. 26 Dated: July 24, 2012 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 27 28 1 CASE NO. 12-CV-01446-LHK ORDER DISMISSING ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?