Grobler v. Apple Inc.

Filing 31

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 28 Stipulation selecting Private ADR. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/26/2012)

Case5:12-cv-01534-LHK Document28 Filed07/19/12 Page1 of 2

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
BENJAMIN GROBLER
,
Plaintiff(s),
v.
APPLE INC.

CASE NO. ______________________
3:12-CV-01534-RS
LHK
5
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
9
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
The parties have agreed
✔
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
to private mediation from a provider to be determined by mutual assent of the parties.
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
✔
9
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order
referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
9

other requested deadline _____________________________________________

Dated:___________
7/19/2012

____________________________
/s/ Richard C. Lin
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated:____________
7/19/2012

____________________________
/s/ Alfredo A. Perez de Alejo
Attorney for Defendant

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

Case5:12-cv-01534-LHK Document28 Filed07/19/12 Page2 of 2
[PROPOSED] ORDER
9
9

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

Dated: July 26, 2012

__________________________________
Lucy H. Koh
MAGISTRATE
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
United States District Court

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2