Viasphere International , Inc v. Vardaryan

Filing 90

ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd terminating (55) Vardanyan's Ex Parte Application; granting (57) Vardanyan's Motion for Reconsideration; denying (60) plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions in case 5:12-cv-01536-HRL; denying (27) defendants' Motion for Sanctions in case 5:12-cv-05645-HRL. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013)

Download PDF
1 *E-FILED: June 24, 2013* 2 3 4 5 6 NOT FOR CITATION 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 7 VIASPHERE INTERNATIONAL, INC., No. C12-01536 HRL Plaintiff, 12 [Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 57, 60] v. 13 ARAM VARDANYAN, ORDER GRANTING VARDANYAN’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION 14 Defendant. 15 16 / ARAM VARDANYAN, 17 ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR SANCTIONS FILED BY VIASPHERE, MOROYAN, AND ALPHA VENTURES Plaintiff, v. No. C12-05645 HRL 18 19 ANTHONY MOROYAN; ALPHA VENTURES, LLC, 20 [Re: Dkt. No. 27] Defendants. / 21 In its order on Discovery Dispute Joint Report (DDJR) #1, the court ruled that 22 23 Vardanyan, who lives in Armenia, must travel to Northern California for his deposition.1 24 Shortly after, Vardanyan moved this court to reconsider its order on account of his poor health, 25 which allegedly made air travel unsafe.2 In support, he submitted two “Health Certificates” 26 Vardanyan is the defendant in Case No. C12-01536 and the plaintiff in laterfiled Case No. C12-05645. Both actions have been consolidated for discovery. For convenience, Vardanyan may be referred to here as “defendant” and Viasphere as “plaintiff.” 1 27 28 Vardanyan’s “Ex Parte Application for New ‘Order re Amended Discovery Dispute Joint Report #1,’” filed on February 26, 2013 (Dkt. No. 55) will be terminated as moot. His later filed motion for leave to seek reconsideration is treated as the operative 2 1 from Armenia’s Center of Preventative Cardiology. Following an Interim Order from the court, 2 he submitted a more detailed third Health Certificate and additional material. The gist of the 3 medical information is that defendant has been continuously treated from September 2011 to the 4 present for chronic heart disease and that long air travel is “prohibited” due to the risk of heart 5 attack or stroke. 6 Plaintiff scoffs at the adequacy of the medical justification for excusing Vardanyan from 7 coming to the United States for deposition and wonders if defendant just does not want to 8 bother. The court itself harbors some doubt about the severity of Vardanyan’s health 9 impairment, but it is not prepared to order him to do something his doctor has forbidden for medical reasons. 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Accordingly, the court reconsiders its previous order and reverses it. Vardanyan does 12 not have to travel to California for his deposition. Plaintiff has the choice of either (1) taking 13 the deposition face-to-face in Armenia, or (2) taking it long distance by suitable electronic 14 video means (i.e., Skype). 15 16 The related motion for sanctions filed by Viasphere, Moroyan, and Alpha Ventures is denied. 17 18 SO ORDERED. Dated: June 24, 2013 19 HOWARD R. LLOYD 20 UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 motion. 2 1 5:12-cv-01536-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 2 Ara Aroustamian 3 Helene Anastasia Simvoulakis 4 Stephen Donald Pahl 5 Varand Vartanian ara@lawaa.com hsimvoulakis@pahl-mccay.com, ssamayoa@pahl-mccay.com spahl@pahl-mccay.com, tmeek@pahl-mccay.com Varand@lawaa.com 6 7 5:12-cv-05645-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to: 8 Ara Aroustamian 9 Helene Anastasia Simvoulakis ara@lawaa.com Stephen Donald Pahl 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Varand Vartanian hsimvoulakis@pahl-mccay.com, ssamayoa@pahl-mccay.com spahl@pahl-mccay.com, tmeek@pahl-mccay.com Varand@lawaa.com 12 13 **The court is providing a copy of this order to the Special Master.** 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?