Viasphere International , Inc v. Vardaryan
Filing
90
ORDER by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd terminating (55) Vardanyan's Ex Parte Application; granting (57) Vardanyan's Motion for Reconsideration; denying (60) plaintiff's Motion for Sanctions in case 5:12-cv-01536-HRL; denying (27) defendants' Motion for Sanctions in case 5:12-cv-05645-HRL. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/24/2013)
1
*E-FILED: June 24, 2013*
2
3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
7
VIASPHERE INTERNATIONAL, INC.,
No. C12-01536 HRL
Plaintiff,
12
[Re: Dkt. Nos. 55, 57, 60]
v.
13
ARAM VARDANYAN,
ORDER GRANTING VARDANYAN’S
MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION
14
Defendant.
15
16
/
ARAM VARDANYAN,
17
ORDER DENYING MOTION FOR
SANCTIONS FILED BY VIASPHERE,
MOROYAN, AND ALPHA VENTURES
Plaintiff,
v.
No. C12-05645 HRL
18
19
ANTHONY MOROYAN; ALPHA
VENTURES, LLC,
20
[Re: Dkt. No. 27]
Defendants.
/
21
In its order on Discovery Dispute Joint Report (DDJR) #1, the court ruled that
22
23
Vardanyan, who lives in Armenia, must travel to Northern California for his deposition.1
24
Shortly after, Vardanyan moved this court to reconsider its order on account of his poor health,
25
which allegedly made air travel unsafe.2 In support, he submitted two “Health Certificates”
26
Vardanyan is the defendant in Case No. C12-01536 and the plaintiff in laterfiled Case No. C12-05645. Both actions have been consolidated for discovery. For
convenience, Vardanyan may be referred to here as “defendant” and Viasphere as “plaintiff.”
1
27
28
Vardanyan’s “Ex Parte Application for New ‘Order re Amended Discovery
Dispute Joint Report #1,’” filed on February 26, 2013 (Dkt. No. 55) will be terminated as
moot. His later filed motion for leave to seek reconsideration is treated as the operative
2
1
from Armenia’s Center of Preventative Cardiology. Following an Interim Order from the court,
2
he submitted a more detailed third Health Certificate and additional material. The gist of the
3
medical information is that defendant has been continuously treated from September 2011 to the
4
present for chronic heart disease and that long air travel is “prohibited” due to the risk of heart
5
attack or stroke.
6
Plaintiff scoffs at the adequacy of the medical justification for excusing Vardanyan from
7
coming to the United States for deposition and wonders if defendant just does not want to
8
bother. The court itself harbors some doubt about the severity of Vardanyan’s health
9
impairment, but it is not prepared to order him to do something his doctor has forbidden for
medical reasons.
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Accordingly, the court reconsiders its previous order and reverses it. Vardanyan does
12
not have to travel to California for his deposition. Plaintiff has the choice of either (1) taking
13
the deposition face-to-face in Armenia, or (2) taking it long distance by suitable electronic
14
video means (i.e., Skype).
15
16
The related motion for sanctions filed by Viasphere, Moroyan, and Alpha Ventures is
denied.
17
18
SO ORDERED.
Dated: June 24, 2013
19
HOWARD R. LLOYD
20
UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
motion.
2
1
5:12-cv-01536-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
2
Ara Aroustamian
3
Helene Anastasia Simvoulakis
4
Stephen Donald Pahl
5
Varand Vartanian
ara@lawaa.com
hsimvoulakis@pahl-mccay.com, ssamayoa@pahl-mccay.com
spahl@pahl-mccay.com, tmeek@pahl-mccay.com
Varand@lawaa.com
6
7
5:12-cv-05645-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:
8
Ara Aroustamian
9
Helene Anastasia Simvoulakis
ara@lawaa.com
Stephen Donald Pahl
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
Varand Vartanian
hsimvoulakis@pahl-mccay.com, ssamayoa@pahl-mccay.com
spahl@pahl-mccay.com, tmeek@pahl-mccay.com
Varand@lawaa.com
12
13
**The court is providing a copy of this order to the Special Master.**
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?