Xenoport, Inc. v. GlaxoSmithKline, LLC et al
Filing
40
ORDER Setting Briefing Schedule. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on May 2, 2012. (ejdlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/2/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
SAN JOSE DIVISION
XENOPORT, INC.,
Plaintiff,
v.
GLAXO GROUP LIMITED, ET AL.,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 5:12-CV-1544 EJD
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING
SCHEDULE
(Re: Docket No. 44)
On April 18, 2012, the court stayed the briefing schedule on Plaintiff Xenoport, Inc.’s
17
(“Xenoport”) motion to remand and Defendants’ motion to dismiss and motion to transfer or to
18
stay the action. Having addressed the pending motions to seal related to those motions, the court
19
sets the following briefing schedule.
20
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Xenoport shall file the redacted version of the motion to
21
remand in the public record no later than May 4, 2012. Defendants shall file any opposition brief
22
no later than May 18, 2012. Xenoport shall file any reply brief no later than May 25, 2012.
23
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants shall file the redacted version of the motion
24
to dismiss and the redacted version of the motion to transfer or stay the action in the public record
25
no later than May 4, 2012. Xenoport shall file any opposition briefs no later than May 18, 2012.
26
Defendants shall file any reply briefs no later than May 25, 2012.
27
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that the court schedules a hearing on these motions on
28
Case No.: 5:12-CV-1544 EJD
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
1
1
June 15, 2012.
2
Dated: May 2, 2012
_________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Case No.: 5:12-CV-1544 EJD
ORDER SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?