Torfason v. Astrue

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING re 16 Second Extension for Defendant to File Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Deadline to file Motion/Response due 12/13/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/15/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 MELINDA L. HAAG CSBN 132612 United States Attorney DONNA L. CALVERT, SBN IL 6191786 Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX ELIZABETH BARRY, CSBN 203314 Special Assistant United States Attorney 160 Spear Street, Suite 800 San Francisco, California 94105 Telephone: (415) 977-8972 Facsimile: (415) 744-0134 Email: Elizabeth.Barry@ssa.gov 5 6 7 8 Attorneys for Defendant UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 JAMES PAUL ANDREW TORAFSON ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) ) ) MICHAEL ASTRUE, ) Commissioner of Social Security, ) ) Defendant. ) ___________________________________) CASE NO.: C-5:12-cv-01649-EJD STIPULATION AND XXXXXXX ORDER PROPOSED FOR A SECOND EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE NOTICE, MOTION, AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT 18 IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval 19 20 21 22 of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension, or until December 13, 2012, in which to file his Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment. The undersigned counsel for the Defendant has exercised due diligence in managing her caseload 23 24 25 26 27 28 and makes this request as a result of a heavy briefing schedule. In addition to this matter, in the coming week the undersigned counsel for the Defendant has dispositive briefs due in the following matters: Clark v. Astrue (EDCA) 2:12-cv-00479-CMK, Johnson v. Astrue (NDCA) 4:12-cv-1580-PJH, and Morris-Hawkes v. Astrue (EDCA) 3:12-cv-00483-SMS. /// 1 2 This request is not intended to cause intentional day. This is Defendant’s second request for an extension of time in this matter. 3 4 5 Respectfully submitted, Dated: November 13, 2012 6 7 MELINDA L. HAAG United States Attorney 8 9 /s/ Marc V. Kalagian (as authorized via e-mail) Marc V. Kalagian Attorney for Plaintiff Dated: November 13, 2012 10 11 By /s/ Elizabeth Barry ELIZABETH BARRY Special Assistant U.S. Attorney Attorneys for Defendant 12 13 ORDER 14 PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED. 15 November 15, 2012 DATED:________________________ 16 _________________________________ EDWARD J. DAVILA UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?