Torfason v. Astrue
Filing
17
STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING re 16 Second Extension for Defendant to File Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in Opposition to Plaintiff's Motion for Summary Judgment. Deadline to file Motion/Response due 12/13/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 11/15/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2012)
1
2
3
4
MELINDA L. HAAG CSBN 132612
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT, SBN IL 6191786
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
ELIZABETH BARRY, CSBN 203314
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 977-8972
Facsimile: (415) 744-0134
Email: Elizabeth.Barry@ssa.gov
5
6
7
8
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
JAMES PAUL ANDREW TORAFSON
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
MICHAEL ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________)
CASE NO.: C-5:12-cv-01649-EJD
STIPULATION AND XXXXXXX ORDER
PROPOSED
FOR A SECOND EXTENSION FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE NOTICE, MOTION,
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT
18
IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval
19
20
21
22
of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 30-day extension, or until December 13, 2012, in which to file
his Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
The undersigned counsel for the Defendant has exercised due diligence in managing her caseload
23
24
25
26
27
28
and makes this request as a result of a heavy briefing schedule. In addition to this matter, in the coming
week the undersigned counsel for the Defendant has dispositive briefs due in the following matters:
Clark v. Astrue (EDCA) 2:12-cv-00479-CMK, Johnson v. Astrue (NDCA) 4:12-cv-1580-PJH, and
Morris-Hawkes v. Astrue (EDCA) 3:12-cv-00483-SMS.
///
1
2
This request is not intended to cause intentional day. This is Defendant’s second request for an
extension of time in this matter.
3
4
5
Respectfully submitted,
Dated: November 13, 2012
6
7
MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney
8
9
/s/ Marc V. Kalagian
(as authorized via e-mail)
Marc V. Kalagian
Attorney for Plaintiff
Dated: November 13, 2012
10
11
By /s/ Elizabeth Barry
ELIZABETH BARRY
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant
12
13
ORDER
14
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.
15
November 15, 2012
DATED:________________________
16
_________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?