Torfason v. Astrue

Filing 19

STIPULATION AND ORDER GRANTING A 7-DAY EXTENSION FOR DEFENDANT TO FILE NOTICE, MOTION, AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO PLAINTIFF'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT re 18 Proposed Order, filed by Michael J. Astrue. Notice, Motion, Memorandum due 12/19/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 12/14/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 12/14/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17

MELINDA L. HAAG CSBN 132612
United States Attorney
DONNA L. CALVERT, SBN IL 6191786
Acting Regional Chief Counsel, Region IX
ELIZABETH BARRY, CSBN 203314
Special Assistant United States Attorney
160 Spear Street, Suite 800
San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
JAMES PAUL ANDREW TORAFSON

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
)
MICHAEL ASTRUE,
)
Commissioner of Social Security,
)
)
Defendant.
)
___________________________________)

CASE NO.: C-5:12-cv-01649-EJD
XXXXXXX
STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER
FOR A 7-DAY EXTENSION FOR
DEFENDANT TO FILE NOTICE, MOTION,
AND MEMORANDUM IN SUPPORT OF
CROSS-MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT AND IN OPPOSITION TO
PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY
JUDGMENT

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED, by and between the undersigned attorneys, subject to the approval
of the Court, that Defendant shall have a 7-day extension, or until December 19, 2012, in which to file
his Notice, Motion, and Memorandum in Support of Cross-Motion for Summary Judgment and in
Opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion for Summary Judgment.
The undersigned counsel for the Defendant makes this request as a result of a heavy briefing
schedule. This week the undersigned counsel for the Defendant filed an answering brief in Tobeler v.
Astrue, No. 12-16392 (9th Cir) and also has due a dispositive brief in Johnson v. Astrue, No. 4:12-cv1580-PJH (N.D. Cal.). This is Defendant’s third request for an extension of time in this matter and is not
intended to cause intentional delay.

1
2

Respectfully submitted,
Dated: December 12, 2012

3
4

MELINDA L. HAAG
United States Attorney

5
6

/s/ Marc V. Kalagian
(as authorized via e-mail)
Marc V. Kalagian
Attorney for Plaintiff

Dated: December 12, 2012

7
8

By /s/ Elizabeth Barry
ELIZABETH BARRY
Special Assistant U.S. Attorney
Attorneys for Defendant

9
10

ORDER

11

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

12

12/14/2012
DATED:________________________

13

_________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2