Williams v. Perez et al
Filing
36
ORDER OF SERVICE; Directing Defendants to File Dispositive Motion or Notice Regarding Such Motion. Dispositive Motion due by 4/22/2013. Habeas Answer due by 3/22/2013. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/22/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/22/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
11
JAMES EDWARD WILLIAMS,
12
Plaintiff,
13
14
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
v.
R. PEREZ, et al.,
15
Defendants.
No. C 12-1691 RMW(PR)
ORDER OF SERVICE;
DIRECTING DEFENDANTS
TO FILE DISPOSITIVE
MOTION OR NOTICE
REGARDING SUCH MOTION
16
Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a second amended civil rights complaint
17
pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. For the reasons stated below, the court orders service upon
18
defendants.
19
DISCUSSION
20
A.
Standard of Review
21
A federal court must conduct a preliminary screening in any case in which a prisoner
22
seeks redress from a governmental entity or officer or employee of a governmental entity. See
23
28 U.S.C. § 1915A(a). In its review, the court must identify any cognizable claims and dismiss
24
any claims that are frivolous, malicious, fail to state a claim upon which relief may be granted or
25
seek monetary relief from a defendant who is immune from such relief. See id. § 1915A(b)(1),
26
(2). Pro se pleadings must, however, be liberally construed. See Balistreri v. Pacifica Police
27
Dep’t, 901 F.2d 696, 699 (9th Cir. 1988).
28
Order of Service; Directing Defendants to File Dispositive Motion or Notice Regarding Such Motion
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.12\Williams691srv2.wpd
1
To state a claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983, a plaintiff must allege two essential elements:
2
(1) that a right secured by the Constitution or laws of the United States was violated, and (2) that
3
the alleged deprivation was committed by a person acting under the color of state law. West v.
4
Atkins, 487 U.S. 42, 48 (1988).
5
B.
6
Plaintiff’s Claims
Plaintiff alleges that, on March 29, 2011, Correctional Officers R. Perez and J. Juarez
7
used excessive force upon him. Plaintiff further alleges that Correctional Officers J. Juarez, G.
8
Collier, and Canchola, and Lt. M. Ross exhibited deliberate indifference to plaintiff’s safety by
9
failing to intervene. Liberally construed, plaintiff has alleged cognizable claims that defendants
10
violated his Eighth Amendment rights.
11
CONCLUSION
12
For the foregoing reasons, the court hereby orders as follows:
13
1.
The clerk of the court shall mail a Notice of Lawsuit and Request for Waiver of
14
Service of Summons, two copies of the Waiver of Service of Summons, a copy of the second
15
amended complaint and all attachments thereto (docket no. 33), and a copy of this order to
16
Correctional Officer G. Collier, Correctional Officer Canchola, and Lt. M. Ross, Watch
17
Commander, at Salinas Valley State Prison. The clerk shall also serve a copy of this order on
18
plaintiff and mail a courtesy copy of the second amended complaint to the California Attorney
19
General’s Office.
20
2.
Defendants are cautioned that Rule 4 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure
21
requires them to cooperate in saving unnecessary costs of service of the summons and complaint.
22
Pursuant to Rule 4, if defendants, after being notified of this action and asked by the court, on
23
behalf of plaintiff, to waive service of the summons, fail to do so, they will be required to bear
24
the cost of such service unless good cause is shown for their failure to sign and return the waiver
25
form. If service is waived, this action will proceed as if defendants had been served on the date
26
that the waiver is filed, except that pursuant to Rule 12(a)(1)(B), defendants will not be required
27
to serve and file an answer before sixty (60) days from the date on which the request for waiver
28
was sent. (This allows a longer time to respond than would be required if formal service of
Order of Service; Directing Defendants to File Dispositive Motion or Notice Regarding Such Motion
2
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.12\Williams691srv2.wpd
1
summons is necessary.) Defendants are asked to read the statement set forth at the bottom of the
2
waiver form that more completely describes the duties of the parties with regard to waiver of
3
service of the summons. If service is waived after the date provided in the Notice but before
4
defendants have been personally served, the Answer shall be due sixty (60) days from the date
5
on which the request for waiver was sent or twenty (20) days from the date the waiver form is
6
filed, whichever is later.
7
3.
No later than ninety (90) days from the date of this order, defendants shall file a
8
motion for summary judgment or other dispositive motion with respect to the cognizable claim
9
in the complaint.
10
a.
If defendants elect to file a motion to dismiss on the grounds that plaintiff
11
failed to exhaust his available administrative remedies as required by 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(a),
12
defendants shall do so in an unenumerated Rule 12(b) motion pursuant to Wyatt v. Terhune, 315
13
F.3d 1108, 1119-20 (9th Cir. 2003).
14
b.
Any motion for summary judgment shall be supported by adequate factual
15
documentation and shall conform in all respects to Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil
16
Procedure. Defendants are advised that summary judgment cannot be granted, nor
17
qualified immunity found, if material facts are in dispute. If defendants are of the opinion
18
that this case cannot be resolved by summary judgment, they shall so inform the court
19
prior to the date the summary judgment motion is due.
20
4.
Plaintiff’s opposition to the dispositive motion shall be filed with the court and
21
served on defendants no later than twenty-eight (28) days from the date defendants’ motion is
22
filed. Plaintiff is advised to read Rule 56 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Celotex
23
Corp. v. Catrett, 477 U.S. 317 (1986) (holding party opposing summary judgment must come
24
forward with evidence showing triable issues of material fact on every essential element of his
25
claim).
26
27
28
5.
Defendants shall file a reply brief no later than fourteen (14) days after plaintiff’s
opposition is filed.
6.
The motion shall be deemed submitted as of the date the reply brief is due. No
Order of Service; Directing Defendants to File Dispositive Motion or Notice Regarding Such Motion
3
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.12\Williams691srv2.wpd
1
2
hearing will be held on the motion unless the court so orders at a later date.
7.
All communications by the plaintiff with the court must be served on defendants
3
or defendants’ counsel, by mailing a true copy of the document to defendants or defendants’
4
counsel.
5
6
7
8.
Discovery may be taken in accordance with the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure.
No further court order is required before the parties may conduct discovery.
9.
It is plaintiff’s responsibility to prosecute this case. Plaintiff must keep the court
8
and all parties informed of any change of address and must comply with the court’s orders in a
9
timely fashion. Failure to do so may result in the dismissal of this action for failure to prosecute
10
11
12
13
pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(b).
IT IS SO ORDERED.
DATED:
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
Order of Service; Directing Defendants to File Disposition Motion
4
G:\PRO-SE\SJ.Rmw\CR.12\Williams691srv2.wpd
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
JAMES EDWARD WILLIAMS,
Case Number: CV12-01691 RMW
Plaintiff,
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
v.
R. PEREZ et al,
Defendant.
/
I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District
Court, Northern District of California.
That on January 22, 2013, I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing
said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by
depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office
delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office.
James Edward Williams V-54214
Salinas Valley State Prison
Housing: A-5-143
P.O. Box 1050
Soledad, CA 93960
Dated: January 22, 2013
Richard W. Wieking, Clerk
By: Jackie Lynn Garcia, Deputy Clerk
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?