Maxwell v. Unilever United States, Inc. et al

Filing 82

ORDER RE: STATEMENTS OF RECENT DECISION. The parties to this action shall not file any further Statements of Recent Decision with regard to the currently pending Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/26/2014. (ejdlc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/26/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01736 EJD

AMY MAXWELL individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

ORDER RE: STATEMENTS OF RECENT
DECISION

12

Plaintiff(s),
v.

13
UNILVER UNITED STATES, INC., et. al.,
14
15

Defendant(s).
/

16
17

Since this district’s Civil Local Rules do not provide for the filing of Statements of Recent

18

Decision after a motion’s noticed hearing date,1 the parties to this action shall not file any further

19

Statements of Recent Decision with regard to the currently pending Motion to Dismiss.

20

IT IS SO ORDERED.

21
22

Dated: August 26, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

23
24
25
26
1

27
28

“Before the noticed hearing date, counsel may bring to the Court’s attention a relevant
judicial opinion published after the date the opposition or reply was filed by filing and serving a
Statement of Recent Decision, containing a citation to and providing a copy of the new
opinion–without argument.” Civ. L. R. 7-3(d)(2).
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01736 EJD
ORDER RE: STATEMENTS OF RECENT DECISION