Compression Technology Solutions LLC v. CA, Inc. et al
Filing
223
ORDER granting stipulation. Signed by Judge Whyte on 11/19/2012. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
Paul A. Lesko
plesko@simmonsfirm.com
Jo Anna Pollock
jpollock@simmonsfirm.com
Stephen C. Smith
ssmith@simmonsfirm.com
SIMMONS BROWDER GIANARIS ANGELIDES
& BARNERD LLC
One Court Street
Alton, IL 62002
(618) 259-2222
Attorneys for Plaintiff Compression Technology
Solutions, LLC
Gregory S. Bishop; gbishop@goodwinprocter.com
Thomas F. Fitzpatrick;
tfitzpatrick@goodwinprocter.com
Charles F. Koch; ckoch@goodwinprocter.com
Daniel W. Richards;
drichards@goodwinprocter.com
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
(650) 752-3100
Attorneys for Defendant NetApp, Inc.
14
15
16
Jesse J. Jenner
jesse.jenner@ropesgray.com
Khue V. Hoang; khue.hoang@ropesgray.com
Josef B. Schenker
josef.schenker@ropesgray.com
ROPES & GRAY LLP
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
(212) 596-9000
James Batchelder
james.batchelder@ropesgray.com
Matthew R. Clements;
matthew.clements@ropesgray.com
ROPES & GRAY LLP th
1900 University Ave, 6 Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
(650) 617-4000
Attorneys for Defendant EMC Corporation
Daralyn J. Durie
ddurie@durietangri.com
Clement S. Roberts
croberts@durietangri.com
Lara A. Rogers
lrogers@durietangri.com
Brian C. Howard
bhoward@durietangri.com
DURIE TANGRI LLP
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
(415) 362-6666
Attorneys for Defendant Quantum Corp.
17
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
18
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
19
SAN JOSE DIVISION
20
21
COMPRESSION TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS LLC,
22
23
24
25
26
Plaintiff,
v.
EMC CORPORATION, NETAPP, INC., AND
QUANTUM CORP.,
Case No. 5:12-cv-01746-RMW
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
TO EXTEND TIME FOR INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS AND DOCUMENTS
ACCOMPANYING INVALIDITY
CONTENTIONS
Ctrm: Courtroom 6 - 4th Floor
Judge: Honorable Ronald M. Whyte
Defendants.
27
28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND
DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYING INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS / CASE NO. 5:12-CV-01746- RMW
1
2
3
WHEREAS the Court issued a Scheduling Order on October 11, 2012 setting the dates
for discovery deadlines;
WHEREAS the current deadline for service of Invalidity Contentions and production of
4
Documents Accompanying Invalidity Contentions pursuant to Patent L.Rs. 3-3 and 3-4 is
5
November 26, 2012;
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
WHEREAS on September 17, 2012 the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment
of invalidity;
WHEREAS on October 19, 2012 the Plaintiff filed a motion to stay the November 2,
2012 hearing on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment;
WHEREAS on November 2, 2012 the Court heard oral arguments on Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment and Plaintiff’s motion to stay; and
WHEREAS the parties have stipulated, pursuant to Civil L.R. 6-2, to extend the time for
13
Defendants to serve Invalidity Contentions pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-3 and to produce
14
Documents Accompanying Invalidity Contentions pursuant to Patent L.R. 3-4 until 20 days after
15
the Court issues its ruling on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity;
16
17
18
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE, and request the
Court to order, as follows:
The deadline for Defendants to serve Invalidity Contentions and produce Documents
19
Accompanying Invalidity Contentions, pursuant to Patent L.Rs. 3-3 and 3-4, shall be stayed until
20
20 days after the Court’s ruling on Defendants’ motion for summary judgment of invalidity. All
21
dates following the disclosure of Invalidity Contentions shall be stayed pending adjudication of
22
Defendants’ summary judgment motion.
23
///
24
///
25
///
26
///
27
///
28
///
1
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND
DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYING INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS / CASE NO. 5:12-CV-01746- RMW
1
ROPES & GRAY
Dated: November 14, 2012
2
By:
3
/s/ Khue V. Hoang
KHUE V. HOANG
4
Attorneys for Defendant
EMC CORPORATION
5
6
DURIE TANGRI LLP
Dated: November 14, 2012
By:
7
8
/s/ Clement S. Roberts
CLEMENT S. ROBERTS
Attorneys for Defendant
QUANTUM CORP.
9
10
GOODWIN PROCTOR LLP
Dated: November 14, 2012
11
By:
12
13
Attorneys for Defendant
NETAPP, INC.
14
15
/s/ Gregory S. Bishop
GREGORY S. BISHOP
SIMMONS BROWDER GIANARIS
ANGELIDES & BARNERD LLC
Dated: November 14, 2012
16
By:
17
18
/s/ Paul A. Lesko
PAUL A. LESKO
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COMPRESSION TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS, LLC
19
20
21
IT IS SO ORDERED.
22
DATED: November 19, 2012
HON. RONALD M. WHYTE
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND
DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYING INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS / CASE NO. 5:12-CV-01746- RMW
1
2
3
FILER’S ATTESTATION
Pursuant to Civil L.R. 5-1(i)(3), regarding signatures, I, Clement S. Roberts, attest that
concurrence in the filing of this document has been obtained.
4
5
Dated: November 14, 2012
/s/ Clement S. Roberts
CLEMENT S. ROBERTS
6
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
7
8
9
I certify that all counsel of record is being served on November 14, 2012 with a copy of
this document via the Court’s CM/ECF system.
10
11
Dated: November 14, 2012
/s/ Clement S. Roberts
CLEMENT S. ROBERTS
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO EXTEND TIME FOR INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND
DOCUMENTS ACCOMPANYING INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS / CASE NO. 5:12-CV-01746- RMW
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?