Compression Technology Solutions LLC v. CA, Inc. et al

Filing 228

STIPULATION AND ORDER 227 to Extend Time for Mediation. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 1/29/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/29/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Paul A. Lesko
[e-mail]
Jo Anna Pollock
[e-mail]
Stephen C. Smith
[e-mail]
SIMMONS BROWDER GIANARIS
ANGELIDES & BARNERD LLC
One Court Street
Alton, IL 62002
[phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff Compression
Technology Solutions, LLC
Gregory S. Bishop;
[e-mail]
Thomas F. Fitzpatrick;
[e-mail]
Charles F. Koch; [e-mail]
Daniel W. Richards;
[e-mail]
GOODWIN PROCTER LLP
135 Commonwealth Drive
Menlo Park, CA 94025
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant NetApp, Inc.

15
16
17

Jesse J. Jenner
[e-mail]
Khue V. Hoang; [e-mail]
Josef B. Schenker
[e-mail]
ROPES & GRAY LLP
1211 Avenue of the Americas
New York, NY 10036
[phone]
James Batchelder
[e-mail]
Matthew R. Clements;
[e-mail]
ROPES & GRAY LLP th
1900 University Ave, 6 Floor
East Palo Alto, CA 94303
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant EMC Corporation
Daralyn J. Durie
[e-mail]
Clement S. Roberts
[e-mail]
Lara A. Rogers
[e-mail]
Brian C. Howard
[e-mail]
DURIE TANGRI LLP
217 Leidesdorff Street
San Francisco, CA 94111
[phone]
Attorneys for Defendant Quantum Corp.

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

18
19
20

COMPRESSION TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS LLC,

21
22
23
24
25

Plaintiff,

Case No. 5:12-cv-01746-RMW
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
MEDIATION

v.
EMC CORPORATION, NETAPP, INC., AND
QUANTUM CORP.,
Defendants.

26
27
28
STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS AND DOCUMENTS
ACCOMPANYING INVALIDITY CONTENTIONS / CASE NO. 5:12-CV-01746- RMW

1
2

WHEREAS the Court issued a Scheduling Order on October 11, 2012 setting the date for
mediation;

3

WHEREAS the current deadline for mediation is February 1, 2013;

4
5

WHEREAS on September 17, 2012 the Defendants filed a motion for summary judgment
of invalidity;

6
7

WHEREAS on November 2, 2012 the Court heard oral arguments on Defendants’ motion
for summary judgment;

8
9
10
11

WHEREAS on November 19, 2012, the Court granted a stay of the deadline for
Defendants to serve Invalidity Contentions and produce Documents Accompanying Invalidity
Contentions, pursuant to Patent L.Rs. 3-3 and 3-4, as well as all dates following the disclosure of
Invalidity Contentions, pending adjudication of Defendants’ summary judgment motion;

12
13

WHEREAS on January 15, 2012, the ADR Case Administrator notified by the parties by
electronic mail that M. Scott Donahey has been appointed to serve as mediator in this case;

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

WHEREAS the parties have stipulated to extend the deadline for mediation from
February 1, 2013 until 60 days after the Court’s issuance of a claim construction order in this
case;
WHEREAS the parties were directed by the ADR Case Administrator to file not later
than January 23, 2013, a stipulation and proposed order requesting that the deadline be extended;
WHEREAS the parties inadvertently missed the January 23, 2013 deadline to file this
stipulation and proposed order;
WHEREAS the parties contacted the ADR Case Administrator by telephone on January
25, 2013 to request permission to file this stipulation and proposed order herewith;
WHEREAS such permission was granted by the ADR Case Administrator;
NOW, THEREFORE, the parties hereby STIPULATE AND AGREE, and request the
Court to order, as follows:
The deadline for Defendants to individually engage in mediation pursuant to ¶ 3 of the
Court’s October 11, 2012 Scheduling Order and ADR Local Rule 6 shall be extended until 60

28
1
DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT /
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-01746-RMW

1

days after the Court’s ruling on claim construction.

2
3

ROPES & GRAY

Dated: January 25, 2013

4

By:

5

/s/ Khue V. Hoang
KHUE V. HOANG
Attorneys for Defendant
EMC CORPORATION

6
7
8

DURIE TANGRI LLP

Dated: January 25, 2013
By:

9
10

Attorneys for Defendant
QUANTUM CORP

11
12

/s/ Clement S. Roberts
CLEMENT S. ROBERTS

GOODWIN PROCTOR LLP

Dated: January 25, 2013

13

By:

14

/s/ Gregory S. Bishop
GREGORY S. BISHOP
Attorneys for Defendant
NETAPP, INC.

15
16
17

SIMMONS BROWDER GIANARIS
ANGELIDES & BARNERD LLC

Dated: January 25, 2013

18
By:

19
20

/s/ Paul A. Lesko
PAUL A. LESKO
Attorneys for Plaintiff
COMPRESSION TECHNOLOGY
SOLUTIONS, LLC

21
22
23

IT IS SO ORDERED.

24
25

DATED:
________________________________

26

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

27
28
2

DEFENDANTS’ REPLY IN SUPPORT OF THEIR JOINT MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT /
CASE NO. 5:12-CV-01746-RMW