Pham v. City of San Jose et al

Filing 7

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE Why This Action Should Not Be Dismissed.Plaintiff's Show Cause Response due by 8/24/2012. Signed by Magistrate Judge Howard R. Lloyd on 8/8/2012. (hrllc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/8/2012)

1
2

*E-FILED: August 8, 2012*

3
4
5
6
NOT FOR CITATION

8

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

9

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

10

SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

7

12
13
14
15
16

No. C12-01750 HRL

TRIEU PHAM,

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THIS
ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED

Plaintiff,
v.
CITY OF SAN JOSE, a municipality; SAN
JOSE POLICE DEPARTMENT, a department
of municipality; OFFICER HERNANDEZ, an
individual; SGT. MONTONYE, an individual;
and DOES 1-20,

17

Defendants.
/

18
19

On April 4, 2012, pro se plaintiff Trieu Pham filed this action for alleged civil rights

20

violations. There is no indication that defendants have been served, and the deadline for service

21

has passed. FED. R. CIV. P. 4(m). On July 5, 2012, the court issued a clerk’s notice continuing

22

the date for the initial case management conference and related deadlines. (Dkt. No. 4). On

23

July 10, 2012, that notice was returned to the court as undeliverable.1 (Dkt. No. 5). Plaintiff did

24

not appear for the August 7, 2012 initial case management conference. There has been no other

25

activity on the docket since the complaint was filed.

26
27
28
Plaintiff has until September 10, 2012 to provide the court with a current
mailing address. CIV. L.R. 3-11. In any event, the ECF system indicates that plaintiff may
be receiving electronic notices of all court filings.
1

1

Accordingly, no later than August 24, 2012, plaintiff shall file a response to this order,

2

explaining why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Plaintiff is advised

3

that the failure to file a response as directed will be considered additional ground for dismissal.

4
5

SO ORDERED.
Dated: August 8, 2012

6
7
HOWARD R. LLOYD
8

UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE

9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2

1

5:12-cv-01750-HRL Notice has been electronically mailed to:

2

Trieu Pham
181 Ivy Hill Way
Los Gatos, CA 95032

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

11
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
3