Quantum Biotek Pty, Ltd. v. Jenzeh et al

Filing 17

STIPULATION AND ORDER 15 Selecting ADR Process. Case Referred to Mediation. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 9/13/12. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/13/2012)

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
QUANTUM BIOTEK PTY LTD.
Plaintiff(s),
v.

CASE NO. CV12 1809 RMW
STIPULATION AND []
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

MICHAEL JENZEH, an individual, STEFANIE
JENZEH, an individual, OMNI ENVIRO LLC,
a California limited liability company,
Defendant(s).
_______________________________________
MICHAEL JENZH, et al.
Counterclaim-Plaintiffs,
v.
QUANTUM BIOTEK PTY LTD.
Counterclaim-Defendants.
_______________________________________/
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:
The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
9
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
9
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
XX
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)
Private Process:
9
Private ADR (please identify process and provider) ______________________
_____________________________________________________________________________
The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
9 the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the order referring the
case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )
XX other requested deadline ninety (90) days from the Case Management Conference.
Dated: August 24, 2012

/s/ Lawrence G. Townsend
Attorney for Plaintiff

As the filing attorney, I attest that the foregoing is accepted by counsel signing below.

Dated: August 24, 2012

/s/ Arthur Chapman
Attorney for Defendant

[] ORDER
9
9

Dated:

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.
The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO ORDERED.

__________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

When filing this document in ECF, please be sure to use the appropriate Docket
Event, e.g., “Stipulation and Proposed Order Selecting Mediation.”

Rev. 12/11
Page 2 of 2