St. Paul Mercury Insurance Company v. Tessera, Inc.

Filing 44

Order by Hon. Ronald M. Whyte granting 28 Administrative Motion to File Under Seal.(rmwlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2012)

1
2
E-FILED on 11/19/2012

3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11

ST. PAUL MERCURY INSURANCE
COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation,

No. C-5-01827 RMW

12
Plaintiff-Counterdefendant,
13
v.
14
TESSERA, INC., a Delaware corporation,

ORDER GRANTING TESSERA. INC.'S
ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE
TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF
DOCUMENT

15
Defendant-Counterclaimant.

[Re Docket No. 28]

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

Defendant and Counterclaimant Tessera, Inc. ("Tessera") filed an administrative motion for
leave to file under seal portions of the document submitted in support of Tessera's motion for partial
summary judgment. Having reviewed the proposed material to be sealed, and in light of the reasons
given by the court that previously allowed this material to be filed under seal in the underlying
action, Tessera's motion is GRANTED.
It is therefore ORDERED that the following portions of the document entitled Stipulation
Regarding Undisputed Facts shall be filed under seal:

26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING TESSERA. INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF
DOCUMENT—No. C-5-01827 RMW
ALG

1
2

a.

Exhibit E (the Complaint filed on December 16, 2011 on behalf of Powertech

3

Technology Inc. ("PTI") against Tesssera in an action entitled Powertech

4

Technology, Inc. v. Tessera, Inc., in the United States District Court for the Northern

5

District of California, Case no. C11-6121 (the "Underlying Action")): Pages bearing

6

Bates number T-UND000096 through -123, and T-UND000361through -386.

7

b.

8
9

Exhibit F (PTI's (Proposed) Amended Complaint against Tessera in the Underlying
Action): Paragraphs 24-35, 37, 39, 40, 50-52, 56-61, 64, 65, and 95.

c.

Exhibit G (PTI's (Proposed) Second Amended Complaint against Tessera in the

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10

Underlying Action): Paragraphs 24-35, 37, 39, 40, 51-53, 57-62, 64-66, 68, 69, and

11

103.

12

d.

Exhibit H (PTI's (Proposed) Third Amended Complaint against Tessera in the

13

Underlying Action): Paragraphs 24-35, 37, 39, 40, 51-53, 57-62, 64-66, 68, 69, 109,

14

and 122-124.

15

e.

Exhibit I (PTI's (Proposed) Fourth Amended Complaint against Tessera in the

16

Underlying Action): Paragraphs 24-35, 37, 39, 40, 51-53, 57-62, 64-66, 68, 69, 109,

17

and 122-124.

18

f.

Exhibit L (Tessera's counterclaims against Powertech filed under seal in the

19

underlying action): Paragrpahs 1, 2, 4-13, 15-17, 19, 22, 29, 31, 33, 39, 42, 44, 46 and

20

pages bearing Bates numbers T-UND 002681 through -2695, T-UND 002698

21

through -2723, and T-UND 002725 through -2735.

22
23
24
25

DATED:

November 19, 2012
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge

26
27
28
ORDER GRANTING TESSERA. INC.'S ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION FOR LEAVE TO FILE UNDER SEAL PORTIONS OF
DOCUMENT—No. C-5-01827 RMW
ALG
2