Brazil v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al

Filing 15

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting #7 Application for Admission of Attorney Charles F. Barrett Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2012)

Download PDF
Case5:12-cv-01831-LHK Document7-1 Filed05/21/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 Charles F. Barrett (#20627) CHARLES BARRETT, P.C. 6518 Highway 100, Suite 210 Nashville, Tennessee 37205 (615) 515-3393 (615) 515-3395 (fax) Attorney for Plaintiff 26 Charles F. Barrett. 27 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA SAN JOSE DIVISION CHAD BRAZIL, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, v. DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC., DOLE PACKAGED FOODS, LLC, Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No. 5:12-cv-01831-HRL (PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE This cause came to be heard on Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice of Charles F. Barrett, whose business address and telephone number is CHARLES 28 BARRETT, P.C., 6518 Highway 100, Suite 210, Nashville, Tennessee 37205, (615) 515-3393 29 And who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the State of Tennessee having 30 applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of 31 California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Chad Brazil. 32 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is granted, subject to the terms and 33 conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac 34 vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application Case5:12-cv-01831-LHK Document7-1 Filed05/21/12 Page2 of 2 35 will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements 36 contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing. 37 38 39 Dated: ____________________ May 31, 2012 ___________________________________ U.S. District Court Judge -2-

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?