Brazil v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
Filing
15
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting #7 Application for Admission of Attorney Charles F. Barrett Pro Hac Vice.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 5/31/2012)
Case5:12-cv-01831-LHK Document7-1 Filed05/21/12 Page1 of 2
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
Charles F. Barrett (#20627)
CHARLES BARRETT, P.C.
6518 Highway 100, Suite 210
Nashville, Tennessee 37205
(615) 515-3393
(615) 515-3395 (fax)
Attorney for Plaintiff
26
Charles F. Barrett.
27
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CHAD BRAZIL, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
DOLE FOOD COMPANY, INC.,
DOLE PACKAGED FOODS, LLC,
Defendants.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No. 5:12-cv-01831-HRL
(PROPOSED) ORDER GRANTING
APPLICATION FOR ADMISSION
OF ATTORNEY PRO HAC VICE
This cause came to be heard on Application for Admission of Attorney Pro Hac Vice of
Charles F. Barrett, whose business address and telephone number is CHARLES
28
BARRETT, P.C., 6518 Highway 100, Suite 210, Nashville, Tennessee 37205, (615) 515-3393
29
And who is an active member in good standing of the bar of the State of Tennessee having
30
applied in the above-entitled action for admission to practice in the Northern District of
31
California on a pro hac vice basis, representing Chad Brazil.
32
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the application is granted, subject to the terms and
33
conditions of Civil L.R. 11-3. All papers filed by the attorney must indicate appearance pro hac
34
vice. Service of papers upon and communication with co-counsel designated in the application
Case5:12-cv-01831-LHK Document7-1 Filed05/21/12 Page2 of 2
35
will constitute notice to the party. All future filings in this action are subject to the requirements
36
contained in General Order No. 45, Electronic Case Filing.
37
38
39
Dated: ____________________
May 31, 2012
___________________________________
U.S. District Court Judge
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?