Brazil v. Dole Food Company, Inc. et al
Filing
226
ORDER RE PLAINTIFF'S FILING OF UNREDACTED DOCUMENTS. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 11/14/2014. (lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/14/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
8
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
CHAD BRAZIL, an individual, on his own
behalf and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
13
14
15
Plaintiff,
v.
DOLE PACKAGED FOODS, LLC,
Defendant.
16
17
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 12-CV-01831-LHK
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF
UNREDACTED DOCUMENTS
In the Court’s Order dated November 6, 2014, the Court stated that the parties could “file
18
any renewed motions to seal consistent with this Order,” but that any such motions must be
19
brought “within seven (7) days.” ECF No. 220 at 5. Nevertheless, on November 13, 2014,
20
Plaintiff filed unredacted versions of six documents (ECF Nos. 178-15, 178-16, 178-17, 178-18,
21
178-19, and 187-4) for which the Court had previously denied sealing without prejudice. See ECF
22
No. 224. These six documents are among those Defendant now seeks to seal in a motion filed soon
23
after Plaintiff had filed these documents unredacted. See ECF No. 225. As a result, the Court has
24
locked these six documents from public view pending the Court’s resolution of Defendant’s timely
25
motion.
26
IT IS SO ORDERED.
27
Dated: November 14, 2014
________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
28
1
Case No.: 12-CV-01831-LHK
ORDER RE: PLAINTIFF’S FILING OF UNREDACTED DOCUMENTS
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?