Marble Bridge Funding Group, Inc v. Natures Own Pharmacy, LLC et al

Filing 131

ORDER (ON CONSENT) RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE AND DISCOVERY (AS MODIFIED) re (129 in 5:12-cv-02729-EJD) and (127 in 5:12-cv-01839-EJD). Signed by Judge Paul S. Grewal on 6/18/2014. (ofr, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/18/2014)

3

Vincent P. Hurley
[e-mail]
LAW OFFICE OF VINCENT P. HURLEY
38 Seascape Village
Aptos, CA 95003
[phone]; [phone] (Fax)

4

Attorneys for Plaintff

5

Renée C. Callantine (State Bar No. 155991)
[e-mail]
CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP
575 Market Street, Suite 3050
San Francisco, CA 94105
[phone]; [phone] (Fax)

1
2

6
7
8

CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP

9
10
11
12

Neal W. Cohen
Andrew P. Saulitis
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
HALPERIN BATTAGLIA RAICHT, LLP
40 Wall Street, 37th Floor
New York, NY 10005
[phone]; [phone] (Fax)
Admitted Pro Hac Vice

13
Attorneys for Defendant
14
15
16
17
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

18
19
20

MARBLE BRIDGE FUNDING GROUP,
Plaintiff,

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

Case No. CV 12-02729 EJD (PSG)

v.
EULER HERMES AMERICAN CREDIT
INDEMNITY COMPANY,
Defendant.
EULER HERMES AMERICAN CREDIT
INDEMNITY COMPANY,

[PROPOSED]
ORDER (ON CONSENT)
RE SETTLEMENT CONFERENCE
AND DISCOVERY (AS MODIFIED)

Third-Party Plaintiff,

1
2

v.

3

MARBLE BRIDGE FUNDING GROUP;
NATURE’S OWN PHARMACY, LLC;
RICHARD WALLACE; et al.,

4
5

Third-Party Defendants.

6
7
8

A telephonic conference having been held June 10, 2014 with the Court with plaintiff
Marble Bridge Funding Group (“Marble Bridge”) and defendant Euler Hermes American Credit

9
CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP

Indemnity Company (now known as Euler Hermes North America Insurance Company)
10
11

(“Euler”), by their respective attorneys, to discuss the progress of discovery, the current discovery

12

cutoff deadlines being June 26, 2014 and July 24, 2014 (for expert discovery) (Dkt. No. 108), on

13

consent of the parties, it is ORDERED as follows:

14
15
16

The continuing settlement conference presently set for June 25, 2014 is adjourned to a
date in August-September 2014 on a date to be set by the Court, the parties to confer as to
scheduling and to advise the Court as to their availability in such timeframe.

17
18
19

Any discovery disputes (including as to non-party discovery) shall be presented to the
Court as follows: The parties shall meet and confer pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 37(a)(1) and Civil

20

Local Rule 37-1(a); the party seeking relief shall submit up to 5 page letter brief to the Court

21

outlining the dispute; to which the opposing party shall submit up to 5 page letter brief to the

22

Court outlining any opposition within five business days; whereupon the Court will schedule a

23
24

hearing on shortened time, at which the parties may appear telephonically, pending which the
moving party may submit a reply not exceeding 3 pages.

25
26
27
28

The parties shall meet and confer regarding the scheduling of remaining depositions and
as to remaining discovery, with plaintiff to produce its deposition witnesses prior to August 8,
ORDER ON CONSENT RE DISCOVERY

1
2
3

2014 and all outstanding discovery and Rule 30(b)(6) designations shall be provided at least three
weeks prior to such depositions.
Any request for an extension of fact discovery deadline is to be submitted to Judge

4

Edward J. Davila, and the undersigned Magistrate Judge recommends such extension to

5

September 25, 2014.

6

Dated: June 18, 2014

7
8

CORNERSTONE LAW GROUP

9

___________________________
Hon. Paul S. Grewal
Magistrate Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER ON CONSENT RE DISCOVERY