Marble Bridge Funding Group, Inc v. Natures Own Pharmacy, LLC et al
Filing
62
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT'S MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE. Defendant may arrange for a telephonic appearance at the date and time identified through CourtCall, (888) 882-6878. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/11/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/11/2013) (Additional attachment(s) added on 2/11/2013: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
CASE NOS. 5:12-cv-01839 EJD;
5:12-cv-02729 EJD
MARBLE BRIDGE FUNDING GROUP,
INC.,
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT’S
MOTION TO APPEAR BY TELEPHONE
Plaintiff(s),
v.
13
14
NATURES OWN PHARMACY, LLC, et.
al.,
15
Defendant(s).
16
/
17
18
MARBLE BRIDGE FUNDING GROUP,
INC.,
19
Plaintiff(s),
20
21
v.
EULER HERMES AMERICAN CREDIT
INDEMNITY COMPANY,,
22
23
Defendant(s).
/
24
25
On February 8, 2013, the court received correspondence from Defendant Richard W.
26
Wallace (“Defendant”) requesting a telephonic appearance at the Case Management Conference
27
scheduled for the above-entitled matters on February 22, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. See Docket Item No.
28
61 in 5:12-cv-01839 EJD. Having construed Defendant’s letter as a motion for leave to appear by
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01839 EJD; 5:12-cv-02729 EJD
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
1
telephone, the request is GRANTED. Defendant may arrange for a telephonic appearance at the
2
date and time identified through CourtCall, (888) 882-6878.
3
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
Dated: February 11, 2013
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
6
7
8
9
11
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01839 EJD; 5:12-cv-02729 EJD
ORDER GRANTING MOTIONS TO WITHDRAW AS COUNSEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?