Johnson v. Hill

Filing 2

ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the petition and all attachments thereto on Respondent and Respondent's attorney, the Attorney General of the State of California. The Clerk also shall serve a copy of this order on Petitioner. Habeas Answer due by 9/18/2012. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/20/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/20/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 JOHN A. JOHNSON, Petitioner, 12 13 vs. 14 RICK M. HILL, Warden, 15 Respondent. 16 ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 12-01859 EJD (PR) ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE 17 18 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a petition for a writ of 19 habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his state conviction. 20 Petitioner has paid the filing fee. (See Docket No. 1.) 21 BACKGROUND 22 23 According to the petition, Petitioner was found guilty by a jury in Alameda 24 County Superior Court of second degree robbery and prior convictions. (Pet. at 2.) 25 Petitioner was sentenced to thirty years to life in state prison. (Id.) 26 Petitioner appealed his conviction, and the state appellate court affirmed. The 27 state high court denied review in 1997. (Id. at 3.) Petitioner filed state habeas 28 petitions, with the California Supreme Court denying review in 1998. Order to Show Cause G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\HC.12\01859Johnson_osc.wpd 1 Petitioner also filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus in this Court, which 2 was denied in July 2005. The Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals denied his petition for 3 review the same year. (Id. at 5.) Petitioner filed the instant federal habeas petition on April 13, 2012. 4 5 DISCUSSION 6 7 A. This court may entertain a petition for a writ of habeas corpus “in behalf of a 8 9 Standard of Review person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court only on the ground that he is in custody in violation of the Constitution or laws or treaties of the United 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 States.” 28 U.S.C. § 2254(a). It shall “award the writ or issue an order directing the respondent to show 12 13 cause why the writ should not be granted, unless it appears from the application that 14 the applicant or person detained is not entitled thereto.” Id. § 2243. 15 B. 16 Legal Claims Petitioner claims that California’s Three Strikes Law is being 17 unconstitutionally applied to his prior conviction on various grounds. Liberally 18 construed, his claim is cognizable under § 2254 and merits an answer from 19 Respondent. 20 CONCLUSION 21 22 For the foregoing reasons and for good cause shown, 23 1. The Clerk shall serve by certified mail a copy of this order and the 24 petition and all attachments thereto on Respondent and Respondent’s attorney, the 25 Attorney General of the State of California. The Clerk also shall serve a copy of this 26 order on Petitioner. 27 28 2. Respondent shall file with the court and serve on petitioner, within sixty (60) days of the issuance of this order, an answer conforming in all respects to Order to Show Cause G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\HC.12\01859Johnson_osc.wpd 2 1 Rule 5 of the Rules Governing Section 2254 Cases, showing cause why a writ of 2 habeas corpus should not be issued. Respondent shall file with the answer and serve 3 on Petitioner a copy of all portions of the state trial record that have been transcribed 4 previously and that are relevant to a determination of the issues presented by the 5 petition. 6 If Petitioner wishes to respond to the answer, he shall do so by filing a 7 traverse with the Court and serving it on Respondent within thirty (30) days of his 8 receipt of the answer. 9 3. Respondent may file a motion to dismiss on procedural grounds in lieu of an answer, as set forth in the Advisory Committee Notes to Rule 4 of the Rules 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 Governing Section 2254 Cases. If Respondent files such a motion, Petitioner shall 12 file with the Court and serve on Respondent an opposition or statement of non- 13 opposition within thirty (30) days of receipt of the motion, and Respondent shall 14 file with the court and serve on Petitioner a reply within fifteen (15) days of receipt 15 of any opposition. 16 4. Petitioner is reminded that all communications with the court must be 17 served on Respondent by mailing a true copy of the document to Respondent’s 18 counsel. Petitioner must also keep the Court and all parties informed of any change 19 of address. 20 21 DATED: 7/20/2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 Order to Show Cause G:\PRO-SE\SJ.EJD\HC.12\01859Johnson_osc.wpd 3 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA JOHN A. JOHNSON, Case Number: CV12-01859 EJD Petitioner, CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE v. RICK M. HILL, Warden, Respondent. / I, the undersigned, hereby certify that I am an employee in the Office of the Clerk, U.S. District Court, Northern District of California. 7/20/2012 That on , I SERVED a true and correct copy(ies) of the attached, by placing said copy(ies) in a postage paid envelope addressed to the person(s) hereinafter listed, by depositing said envelope in the U.S. Mail, or by placing said copy(ies) into an inter-office delivery receptacle located in the Clerk's office. John A. Johnson E-89817 Folsom State Prison P. O. Box 715071 Folsom, CA 95763 Dated: 7/20/2012 Richard W. Wieking, Clerk /s/ By: Elizabeth Garcia, Deputy Clerk

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?