Gustavson v. Wrigley Sales Company et al

Filing 25

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 11 Stipulation selecting Early Neutral Evaluation.(lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012)

Case5:12-cv-01861-LHK Document11 Filed06/19/12 Page1 of 7

1
2
3
4
5

Ben F. Pierce Gore (Bar No. 128515)
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
1901 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 350
Campbell, CA 95008
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff

7

Stephen D. Raber (State Bar No. 121958)
David M. Horniak (State Bar No. 268441)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Attorneys for Defendants,
WRIGLEY SALES COMPANY and
WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

PHYLLIS GUSTAVSON, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
Plaintiff,

Case No. C12-01861 HRL
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS

v.
WRIGLEY SALES COMPANY and WM.
WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY,

CLASS ACTION

Defendants.
Counsel report that they have met and conferred regarding ADR and have reached the
following stipulation pursuant to Civil L.R. 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5:

28
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - C12-01861 HRL

Case5:12-cv-01861-LHK Document11 Filed06/19/12 Page2 of 7

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

The parties agree to participate in the following ADR process:
Court Processes:
Non-binding Arbitration (ADR L.R. 4)
X
Early Neutral Evaluation (ENE) (ADR L.R. 5)
Mediation (ADR L.R. 6)
(Note: Parties who believe that an early settlement conference with a Magistrate Judge is
appreciably more likely to meet their needs than any other form of ADR must participate in an
ADR phone conference and may not file this form. They must instead file a Notice of Need for
ADR Phone Conference. See Civil Local Rule 16-8 and ADR L.R. 3-5)

9

Private Process:
Private ADR (please identify process and provider)_________________

10

____________________________________________________________________________

11

The parties agree to hold the ADR session by:
the presumptive deadline (The deadline is 90 days from the date of the
order referring the case to an ADR process unless otherwise ordered. )

12
13
14

X

other requested deadline Thirty (30) days after the Court rules on
Defendants’ Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff’s Complaint

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22

Dated: June 19, 2012

By: /s/ Ben F. Pierce Gore
Ben F. Pierce Gore (Bar No. 128515)
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
1901 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 350
Campbell, CA 95008
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

23

Attorneys for Plaintiff

24

By: /s/ Stephen D. Raber

25

Stephen D. Raber (State Bar No. 121958)
David M. Horniak (State Bar No. 268441)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]

26
27
28

-2STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - C12-01861 HRL

Case5:12-cv-01861-LHK Document11 Filed06/19/12 Page3 of 7

Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

1
2
3
4
5
6

CONTINUE TO FOLLOWING PAGE

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - C12-01861 HRL

Case5:12-cv-01861-LHK Document11 Filed06/19/12 Page4 of 7

1

[PROPOSED] ORDER

2
3

The parties’ stipulation is adopted and IT IS SO ORDERED.

4

The parties’ stipulation is modified as follows, and IT IS SO

5

ORDERED.

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18

Dated: September 4, 2012

_________________________________

19

UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER SELECTING ADR PROCESS - C12-01861 HRL