Gustavson v. Wrigley Sales Company et al

Filing 34

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 31 Stipulation to Enlarge Time for Briefing on Defendants' Motions to Dismiss.(lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/20/2012)

Case5:12-cv-01861-LHK Document31 Filed09/19/12 Page1 of 7

5

Ben F. Pierce Gore (Bar No. 128515)
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
1901 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 350
Campbell, CA 95008
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff

1
2
3
4

7

13

Stephen D. Raber (State Bar No. 121958)
David M. Horniak (State Bar No. 268441)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

14

Attorneys for Defendants

8
9
10
11
12

15

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27

PHYLLIS GUSTAVSON, individually
and on behalf of all others similarly
situated,
Plaintiff,
v.
WRIGLEY SALES COMPANY,
WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY,
MARS, INC., and MARS CHOCOLATE
NORTH AMERICA, LLC.

Case No. C12-01861 LHK
STIPULATED REQUEST AND
PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE
TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO
DISMISS
CLASS ACTION

Defendants.

28

STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - C12-01861 LHK

Case5:12-cv-01861-LHK Document31 Filed09/19/12 Page2 of 7

1

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, the parties respectfully request that

2

the Court set the following briefing schedule for: (1) the Motion to Dismiss the

3

Amended Complaint filed on September 14, 2012 by Defendants Wrigley Sales

4

Company and Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company, ECF Nos. 27-28; and (2) the Motion to

5

Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed on September 14, 2012 by Defendants Mars, Inc.

6

and Mars Chocolate North America, LLC, ECF Nos. 29-30.

7

The hearing on both motions is currently set for January 31, 2013, at 1:30 p.m.

8

Subject to the Court’s approval, the parties hereby stipulate to the following briefing

9

schedule:

10
11
12

1. Plaintiff’s brief(s) in opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss shall be due
on or before November 16, 2012.
2. Defendants’ reply brief(s) in support of their motions to dismiss shall be due on

13

or before December 21, 2012.

14

As explained in the attached Declaration of Stephen D. Raber, these time

15

modifications will have no effect on the schedule for this case.

16
17

Dated: September 19, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

18
19

By: /s/ Ben F. Pierce Gore

20

24

Ben F. Pierce Gore (Bar No. 128515)
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
1901 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 350
Campbell, CA 95008
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

25

Attorneys for Plaintiff

21
22
23

26
27
28

By: /s/ Stephen D. Raber
Stephen D. Raber (State Bar No. 121958)
David M. Horniak (State Bar No. 268441)
-2STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - C12-01861 LHK

Case5:12-cv-01861-LHK Document31 Filed09/19/12 Page3 of 7

5

WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Defendants

1
2
3
4

7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - C12-01861 LHK

Case5:12-cv-01861-LHK Document31 Filed09/19/12 Page4 of 7

1
2
3
4
5

ATTESTATION
I, Stephen D. Raber, am the ECF user whose User ID and Password are being used
to file the STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME

FOR BRIEFING ON DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS. In compliance with

6

Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this document has been

7

obtained from signatories Ben F. Pierce Gore.

8
9
10
11
12
13
14

Dated: September 19, 2012

By: /s/ Stephen D. Raber
Stephen D. Raber (State Bar No. 121958)
David M. Horniak (State Bar No. 268441)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-4STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - C12-01861 LHK

Case5:12-cv-01861-LHK Document31 Filed09/19/12 Page5 of 7

[PROPOSED] ORDER

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s brief(s) in opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss shall be due on
or before November 16, 2012.
Defendants’ reply brief(s) in support of their motions to dismiss shall be due on or
before December 21, 2012.

8
9
10

September 20, 2012
DATED: _______________

______________________________
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

STIPULATED REQUEST AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR BRIEFING ON
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - C12-01861 LHK