Gustavson v. Wrigley Sales Company et al

Filing 38

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 37 Stipulation to Enlarge Time for Plaintiff's Response to Defendants' Motion to Dismiss.(lhklc3, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/21/2012)

1
2
3
4
5

Ben F. Pierce Gore (Bar No. 128515)
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
1871 The Alameda, Suite 425
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

6

Attorneys for Plaintiff

7

12

Stephen D. Raber (State Bar No. 121958)
David M. Horniak (State Bar No. 268441)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

13

Attorneys for Defendants

8
9
10
11

14

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION

15
16
17
18

PHYLLIS GUSTAVSON, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,

19
20
21
22
23
24

Case No. C12-01861 LHK

v.

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED
ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS

WRIGLEY SALES COMPANY,
WM. WRIGLEY JR. COMPANY, MARS,
INC., and MARS CHOCOLATE NORTH
AMERICA, LLC.

CLASS ACTION

Plaintiff,

Defendants.

25
26

Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-1(b) and 6-2, the parties respectfully request that the

27

Court approve the following modification to the briefing schedule for: (1) the Motion to

28

Dismiss the Amended Complaint filed on September 14, 2012 by Defendants Wrigley Sales

STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - C12-01861 LHK

1

Company and Wm. Wrigley Jr. Company, ECF Nos. 27-28; and (2) the Motion to Dismiss the

2

Amended Complaint filed on September 14, 2012 by Defendants Mars, Inc. and Mars

3

Chocolate North America, LLC, ECF Nos. 29-30.

4

Plaintiff’s brief(s) are presently due on November 16, 2012. The hearing on both

5

motions is currently set for January 31, 2013, at 1:30 p.m. Subject to the Court’s approval, the

6

parties hereby stipulate as follows:

7

1. Plaintiff’s brief(s) in opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss shall be due on or

8

before November 21, 2012.

9

As explained in the attached Declaration of Pierce Gore, these time modifications will

10

have no effect on the schedule for this case.

11
12

Dated: November 15, 2012

Respectfully submitted,

13
14

By: /s/ Pierce Gore

15

Ben F. Pierce Gore (Bar No. 128515)
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
1871 The Alameda, Suite 425
San Jose, CA 95126
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]

16
17
18
19
20

Attorneys for Plaintiff

21

By: /s/ Stephen D. Raber

22

27

Stephen D. Raber (State Bar No. 121958)
David M. Horniak (State Bar No. 268441)
WILLIAMS & CONNOLLY LLP
725 Twelfth Street, N.W.
Washington, DC 20005
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
E-mail: [e-mail]
E-mail: [e-mail]

28

Attorneys for Defendants

23
24
25
26

-2STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - C12-01861 LHK

1

ECF ATTESTATION

2

I, Pierce Gore, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file the

3

following: STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR

4

PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS. In

5

compliance with General Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Stephen D. Raber has concurred

6

in this filing.

7
8

[PROPOSED] ORDER

9
10
11
12

Pursuant to the foregoing Stipulation, it is hereby ORDERED that:
Plaintiff’s brief(s) in opposition to Defendants’ motions to dismiss shall be due on or before
November 21, 2012.

13
14
15
16

DATED:

______________________________
Hon. Lucy H. Koh
UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE

17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-3STIPULATION AND PROPOSED ORDER TO ENLARGE TIME FOR PLAINTIFF’S RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS TO DISMISS - C12-01861 LHK