Samet v. Proctor and Gamble Company

Filing 168

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS by Judge Paul S. Grewal denying 142 ; denying 147 ; denying 151 ; denying 152 . (psglc1S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/10/2015)

1
2
3
4

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

5

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

6
7

SARAH SAMET, et al.,

8

Plaintiffs,

ORDER DENYING MOTIONS

v.

9
10

(Re: Docket No. 142, 147, 151, 152)

KELLOGG COMPANY, et al.,
Defendants.

11
United States District Court
Northern District of California

Case No. 5:12-cv-01891-PSG

12
In light of the court’s order partially staying this case,1 Plaintiffs Sarah Samet and Robert

13
14

Figy’s pending motion for leave to file an amended motion for class certification2 is DENIED.

15

Defendants Procter & Gamble Co., Kellogg Company, and Kellogg Sales Company’s motions to

16

strike the Scarbrough Declaration,3 exclude Caswell’s expert opinions and testimony,4 and strike

17

portions of Plaintiffs’ motion for class certification5 also are DENIED in light of the partial stay.

18

All motions are denied without prejudice to renewal upon the lifting of the stay. The court shall

19

resolve the motion for class certification on the narrow issue of standing, as indicated in its earlier

20

order.6

21
1

See Docket No. 167.

2

See Docket No. 142

3

See Docket No. 147.

4

See Docket No. 151.

26

5

See Docket No. 152.

27

6

See Docket No. 167 at 4.

22
23
24
25

28

1
Case No. 5:12-cv-01891-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS

1

SO ORDERED.

2

Dated: November 10, 2015
_________________________________
PAUL S. GREWAL
United States Magistrate Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

United States District Court
Northern District of California

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

2
Case No. 5:12-cv-01891-PSG
ORDER DENYING MOTIONS