Titan Global, LLC et al v. Organo Gold Int'l, Inc et al

Filing 45

ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 9/18/2012. (lhklc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 TITAN GLOBAL LLC, a Nevada limited liability company; MATHEW RASMUSSEN and LISA RASMUSSEN, husband and wife, residents of California, ) ) ) ) ) Plaintiffs, ) v. ) ) ORGANO GOLD INT’L, INC., a Washington ) corporation; HOLTON BUGGS JR. and JANE ) DOE BUGGS, Texas residents; ROMACIO ) FULCHER, a single man and a California ) resident; RRAMON FULCHER SR. and TYRA ) FULCHER, husband and wife, California ) residents; KYLE A. SOLON, a single man and a ) California resident; JOHN DOES AND JANE ) DOES 1-25; JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES ) 26-50; and XYZ CORPORATIONS AND LLCS ) 1-25, ) ) Defendants. ) ) Case No.: 12-CV-2104-LHK ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING 22 A hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss and an initial case management conference are 23 scheduled for September 20, 2012. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds 24 Defendants’ motion to dismiss suitable for determination without oral argument. Accordingly, the 25 hearing on the motion to dismiss is hereby VACATED. The case management conference remains 26 set for September 20, 2012. The Court will issue an order on the motion shortly. 27 IT IS SO ORDERED. 28 1 Case No.: 12-CV-2104-LHK ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING 1 Dated: September 18, 2012 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-2104-LHK ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?