Titan Global, LLC et al v. Organo Gold Int'l, Inc et al
Filing
45
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 9/18/2012. (lhklc4, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/18/2012)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
TITAN GLOBAL LLC, a Nevada limited
liability company; MATHEW RASMUSSEN
and LISA RASMUSSEN, husband and wife,
residents of California,
)
)
)
)
)
Plaintiffs,
)
v.
)
)
ORGANO GOLD INT’L, INC., a Washington )
corporation; HOLTON BUGGS JR. and JANE )
DOE BUGGS, Texas residents; ROMACIO
)
FULCHER, a single man and a California
)
resident; RRAMON FULCHER SR. and TYRA )
FULCHER, husband and wife, California
)
residents; KYLE A. SOLON, a single man and a )
California resident; JOHN DOES AND JANE )
DOES 1-25; JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES )
26-50; and XYZ CORPORATIONS AND LLCS )
1-25,
)
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No.: 12-CV-2104-LHK
ORDER VACATING MOTION
HEARING
22
A hearing on Defendants’ motion to dismiss and an initial case management conference are
23
scheduled for September 20, 2012. Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 7-1(b), the Court finds
24
Defendants’ motion to dismiss suitable for determination without oral argument. Accordingly, the
25
hearing on the motion to dismiss is hereby VACATED. The case management conference remains
26
set for September 20, 2012. The Court will issue an order on the motion shortly.
27
IT IS SO ORDERED.
28
1
Case No.: 12-CV-2104-LHK
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING
1
Dated: September 18, 2012
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-2104-LHK
ORDER VACATING MOTION HEARING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?