Titan Global, LLC et al v. Organo Gold Int'l, Inc et al

Filing 83

ORDER GRANTING #81 STIPULATION FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE; DENYING AS MOOT #73 MOTION TO DISMISS; DENYING AS MOOT #78 MOTION FOR PRO HAC VICE (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/15/2013)

Case5:12-cv-02104-LHK Document82 Filed04/15/13 Page1 of 2

1
2
3
4
5

David G. Eisenstein, SBN 224646
LAW OFFICES OF DAVID G. EISENSTEIN, P.C.
4027 Aidan Circle
Carlsbad, CA 92008
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Email: [e-mail]
Attorney for Plaintiffs
Titan Global LLC, Mathew Rasmussen and Lisa Rasmussen

6
7

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

10
11

TITAN GLOBAL LLC, a Nevada Limited
Liability Company; MATHEW RASMUSSEN
and LISA RASMUSSEN, husband and wife,
residents of California,

Case No. 5:12-CV-2104-LHK
Honorable Lucy H. Koh

12
Plaintiffs,
13

ORDER (PROPOSED) FOR DISMISSAL
WITH PREJUDICE

v.
14
15
16
17
18
19

ORGANO GOLD INT’L, INC., a Washington
corporation; HOLTON BUGGS JR. and JANE
DOE BUGGS, Texas residents; ROMACIO
FULCHER, a single man and a California resident;
RRAMON FULCHER SR. and TYRA
FULCHER, husband and wife, California
residents; KYLE A. SOLON, a single man and a
California resident; JOHN DOES AND JANE
DOES 1-25; JOHN DOES AND JANE DOES 2650; XYZ CORPORATIONS AND LLCS 1-25;
and XYZ CORPORATIONS AND LLCS 1-25,

Courtroom: 8
Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh
Complaint Filed: April 26, 2012

20
Defendants.
21
22

The parties, by and through their respective undersigned counsel of record, pursuant to Federal Rule

23

of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), have moved this Court for an order dismissing any and all claims and

24

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - 1

Case5:12-cv-02104-LHK Document82 Filed04/15/13 Page2 of 2

1

causes of action asserted herein by or against any and all parties hereto, with prejudice and without an award

2

of costs or attorneys’ fees to any party.

3

GOOD CAUSE APPEARING, the case is hereby dismissed with prejudice, without an award of

4

,
costs or attorneys’ fees to any party. Defendantsshall closemotionto dismiss is denied as73) and ECF No.
The Clerk pending the file.
Defendants'pending motion to dismiss (ECF No. moot. the

5

pending motionshalladmission file. hac vice (ECF No. 78) are denied as moot. The Clerk shall close
73. The Clerk for close the pro IT IS SO ORDERED.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
the file. IT IS SO ORDERED.
April 2013.
DATED THIS 15th
Date: April 15, 2013 ____ day of ______, 2013.

6
7
8
9

___________________
Honorable Lucy H. Koh
District Court Judge

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24

ORDER FOR DISMISSAL WITH PREJUDICE - 2