Zynga, Inc. v. Kobojo SAS

Filing 13

ORDER GRANTING 12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Zynga, Inc. ***CMC Deadlines terminated. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/4/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012)

Download PDF
Attorneys for Plaintiff ZYNGA INC. ER rd J . D a 10 R NIA d wa J u d ge E H 9 RT 8 NO 7 vila FO 6 LI 5 DERED O OR IT IS S A 4 S DISTRICT TE C TA RT U O 3 S 2 Larry W. McFarland (Bar No. 129668) E-Mail: lmcfarland@kmwlaw.com Dennis Wilson (Bar No. 155407) E-Mail: dwilson@kmwlaw.com David K. Caplan (Bar No. 181174) E-Mail: dcaplan@kmwlaw.com Christopher Varas (Bar No. 257080) E-Mail: cvaras@kmwlaw.com KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP 9720 Wilshire Boulevard Penthouse Suite Beverly Hills, California 90212 Telephone: (310) 248-3830 Facsimile: (310) 860-0363 UNIT ED 1 N F D IS T IC T O R C 9/4/2012 11 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 12 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 13 SAN JOSE DIVISION 14 15 16 ZYNGA INC., a Delaware Corporation, 17 18 19 Plaintiff, CASE NO.: CV 12-02236 EJD NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE UPON CONSENT v. KOBOJO SAS, a French business entity, 20 21 Defendant. 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 CASE NO. CV 12-02236 EJD NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE UPON CONSENT 1 Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and with the consent of both parties, 2 Plaintiff Zynga Inc. hereby voluntarily dismisses the instant action in its entirety with prejudice. 3 Kobojo SAS has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment in this matter. See Fed. R. 4 Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Each party shall bear its own fees and costs incurred in connection therewith. 5 The Clerk shall close this file. 6 KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP 7 8 9 Dated: August 31, 2012 By:/s/Christopher T. Varas Christopher T. Varas Attorneys for Plaintiff ZYNGA INC. 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 -1- CASE NO. CV 12-02236 EJD NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH PREJUDICE UPON CONSENT

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?