Zynga, Inc. v. Kobojo SAS
Filing
13
ORDER GRANTING 12 Notice of Voluntary Dismissal filed by Zynga, Inc. ***CMC Deadlines terminated. The Clerk shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 9/4/2012. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 9/4/2012)
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ZYNGA INC.
ER
rd J . D a
10
R NIA
d wa
J u d ge E
H
9
RT
8
NO
7
vila
FO
6
LI
5
DERED
O OR
IT IS S
A
4
S DISTRICT
TE
C
TA
RT
U
O
3
S
2
Larry W. McFarland (Bar No. 129668)
E-Mail: lmcfarland@kmwlaw.com
Dennis Wilson (Bar No. 155407)
E-Mail: dwilson@kmwlaw.com
David K. Caplan (Bar No. 181174)
E-Mail: dcaplan@kmwlaw.com
Christopher Varas (Bar No. 257080)
E-Mail: cvaras@kmwlaw.com
KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP
9720 Wilshire Boulevard
Penthouse Suite
Beverly Hills, California 90212
Telephone: (310) 248-3830
Facsimile: (310) 860-0363
UNIT
ED
1
N
F
D IS T IC T O
R
C
9/4/2012
11
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
12
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
13
SAN JOSE DIVISION
14
15
16
ZYNGA INC., a Delaware Corporation,
17
18
19
Plaintiff,
CASE NO.: CV 12-02236 EJD
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS
WITH PREJUDICE UPON CONSENT
v.
KOBOJO SAS, a French business entity,
20
21
Defendant.
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CASE NO. CV 12-02236 EJD
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH
PREJUDICE UPON CONSENT
1
Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 41(a)(1) and with the consent of both parties,
2
Plaintiff Zynga Inc. hereby voluntarily dismisses the instant action in its entirety with prejudice.
3
Kobojo SAS has not filed an answer or a motion for summary judgment in this matter. See Fed. R.
4
Civ. P. 41(a)(1). Each party shall bear its own fees and costs incurred in connection therewith.
5
The Clerk shall close this file.
6
KEATS McFARLAND & WILSON LLP
7
8
9
Dated: August 31, 2012
By:/s/Christopher T. Varas
Christopher T. Varas
Attorneys for Plaintiff
ZYNGA INC.
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
-1-
CASE NO. CV 12-02236 EJD
NOTICE OF DISMISSAL OF CLAIMS WITH
PREJUDICE UPON CONSENT
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?