Ibarra v. City of Watsonville et al

Filing 23

Order Granting 22 Stipulation to Extend Time for Plaintiff to File Response to Defendant Belcher, Ehle, & Medina & Associates' Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Hon. Edward J. Davila on 11/27/2012.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/27/2012)

1
2
3

KATHLEEN WELLS (SBN 107051)
3393 Maplethorpe Lane
Soquel, CA 95073
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]

4
5
6
7
8

AARON LODGE (SBN 220670)
1414 Soquel Avenue, Suite 222
Santa Cruz, California 95062
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile:
[phone]
Email:
[e-mail]
Attorneys for plaintiff,
FRANK IBARRA

9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
12

SAN JOSE DIVISION – ECF PROGRAM

13
14

FRANK IBARRA,
CASE # C 12-02271 EJD
Plaintiff,

15
16

v.

17

CITY OF WATSONVILLE, et
al.

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME FOR
PLAINTIFF TO FILE RESPONSE TO
DEFENDANT BELCHER, EHLE &
MEDINA & ASSOCIATES’ MOTION TO
XXXXX
DISMISS; [proposed] ORDER

18
Defendants.
19
20
21

The parties, by and through their undersigned counsel of record, hereby stipulate to

22

continue the date for plaintiff to file his response to defendants’ Motion to Dismiss in this case

23

from November 26, 2012 to December 10, 2012, and for the filing of defendants’ reply brief to

24

December 17, 2012..

25

The reason for this stipulation is that plaintiff’s lead counsel, Kathleen Wells, has been ill

26
Kate Wells
and
Aaron
Lodge,
Attorneys
for plaintiff

for the past two weeks and prior to that, she was in trial for two weeks in Judge Whyte’s

27

courtroom in the case of Norse v. City of Santa Cruz. The hearing on this motion is not until

28

February 8, 2013, and the parties are not requesting a continuance of the hearing date. This court
-1STIPULATION AND ORDER
IBARRA V. CITY OF WATSONVILLE, ET AL. CASE NO. C12-02271 EJD

1

previously granted the stipulation of counsel for the plaintiff and counsel for the City of

2

Watsonville, et al., to extend the time to file his response to their motion to dismiss to December

3

10, 2012, as well. Both of said motions are set to be heard on February 8, 2013.

4
IT IS SO STIPULATED.
5
6
7
8

Dated: November 26, 2012

9

____________/s/________________________
KATHLEEN WELLS,
Attorney for Plaintiff FRANK IBARRA

10
11

ATCHISON, BARISONE, CONDOTTI & KOVACEVICH

12
13
14

Dated: November 26, 2012

15
.

By: ___________/s/__________________________
GEORGE KOVACEVICH
Attorney for Defendants, BELCHER, EHLE, &
MEDINA & ASSOC.

16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Kate Wells
and
Aaron
Lodge,
Attorneys
for plaintiff

27
28
-2STIPULATION AND ORDER
IBARRA V. CITY OF WATSONVILLE, ET AL. CASE NO. C12-02271 EJD

1

ORDER

2
3
4
5
6

Pursuant to stipulation of the parties and good cause appearing therefor, it is hereby
ordered that the date for plaintiff, Francisco Ibarra to file a response to defendants Belcher, Ehle &
Medina & Associates’ Motion to Dismiss is continued from November 26, 2012, to December 10,
2012, and the date for reply is continued to December 17, 2012.

7
8
9
10
11
12

Dated: 11/27/2012

__________________________________________
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Court Judge

13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
Kate Wells
and
Aaron
Lodge,
Attorneys
for plaintiff

27
28
-3STIPULATION AND ORDER
IBARRA V. CITY OF WATSONVILLE, ET AL. CASE NO. C12-02271 EJD