United States Of America et al v. Le

Filing 7

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 6 Motion to Reschedule Hearing on Order to Show Cause.(lhklc3S, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/2/2012)

Download PDF
Case5:12-cv-02302-LHK Document6 Filed06/26/12 Page1 of 2 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 MELINDA HAAG (CABN 132612) United States Attorney THOMAS MOORE (ALBN 4305-O78T) Assistant United States Attorney Chief, Tax Division CYNTHIA STIER (DCBN 423256) Assistant United States Attorney Tax Division 11th Floor Federal Building 450 Golden Gate Avenue, Box 36055 San Francisco, CA 94102 Telephone: (415) 436-7000 Fax: (415) 436-7009 Attorneys for the United States of America 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 ) NO. CV 12-2302-LHK UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and ) SCOTT J. McKAGAN, Revenue Officer, ) ADMINISTRATIVE MOTION TO ) RESCHEDULE HEARING ON ORDER TO Petitioners, ) SHOW CAUSE AND [PROPOSED] ) ORDER v. ) ) Date: August 16, 2012 PHUC LE, ) Time: 1:30 p.m. ) Place: San Jose Federal Courthouse Courtroom 8, 4th Floor Respondent. ) ) ) __________________________________ ) COMES NOW the United States of America and Scott McKagan, by and through its 20 undersigned counsel, pursuant to Rule 7-11 of the Civil Local Rules for the Northern District of 21 California, and moves this Court to reschedule the hearing on the Order to Show Cause, 22 currently scheduled for July 12, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., to August 16, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., in order to 23 enable Petitioners to timely serve Respondent, Phuc Lee. 24 Respectfully submitted, 25 MELINDA HAAG United States Attorney 26 27 28 /s/ Cynthia Stier CYNTHIA STIER Assistant United States Attorney Tax Division Case5:12-cv-02302-LHK Document6 Filed06/26/12 Page2 of 2 ORDER 1 3 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the hearing on the Order to Show Cause, previously 9 scheduled for July 12, 2012, is RESCHEDULED TO AUGUST 16, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., in 4 Courtroom No. 8, 4th Floor, United States District Court, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, 5 California. 6 7 IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that respondent PHUC LE appear before this Court on 9 the 16th day of August, 2012, at 1:30 p.m., in Courtroom No. 8, 4th Floor, United States District 8 Court, 280 South 1st Street, San Jose, California, and then and there show cause, if any, why 9 respondent should not be compelled to appear and provide documents and testimony as required 10 by the summons heretofore served upon respondent as alleged and set forth in particular in said 11 petition; and it is further 2 12 ORDERED that a copy of this Order to Show Cause, together with a copy of the 13 aforesaid petition, be served upon said respondent in accordance with Rule 4 of the Federal 14 Rules of Civil Procedure at least thirty-five (35) days before the return date of this Order above 15 specified; and it is further 16 ORDERED that within twenty-one (21) days before the return date of this Order, 17 respondents may file and serve a written response to the petition, supported by appropriate 18 affidavit(s) or declaration(s) in conformance with 28 U.S.C. ยง 1746, as well as any motion 19 respondent desire to make, that the petitioner may file and serve a written reply to such response, 20 if any, within fourteen (14) days before the return date of this Order; that all motions and issues 21 raised by the pleadings will be considered on the return date of this Order, and only those issues 22 raised by motion or brought into controversy by the responsive pleadings and supported by 23 affidavit(s) or declaration(s) will be considered at the return of this Order, and any uncontested 24 allegation in the petition will be considered admitted. 25 ORDERED this 2 day of July , 2012, at San Jose, California. 26 LUCY H. KOH UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE 27 28 US, et al., v. PHUC LE, Case No. CV 12-2302-LHK Admin. Mot. To Reschedule Hrg. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?