Zazenski v. Danner et al
Filing
38
FINAL JUDGMENT in favor of Teresa Zazenski. Signed by Judge Whyte on 10/4/2013. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
TERESA ZAZENSKI,
Plaintiff,
13
14
15
16
Case No. C-12-2344-RMW
FINAL JUDGMENT
v.
JILLIAN DANNER AND THE SOCIAL
VISTA, LLC.,
[Re Docket No. 35]
Defendants.
17
18
19
On September 10, 2013, the court adopted the Report and Recommendation of the
20
magistrate judge, entered default judgment, but deferred awarding damages until the court could
21
hold an evidentiary hearing. Dkt. No. 35. On October 4, 2013, the court held an evidentiary
22
hearing to determine damages.
23
As the Report and Recommendation noted, a plaintiff cannot recover damages under both
24
contract and fraud. See Roam v. Koop, 41 Cal. App. 3d 1035, 1039, 116 Cal. Rptr. 539 (Ct. App.
25
1974). Because the fraud damages are not as well supported by the evidence and speculative, the
26
court awards damages under a breach of contract theory. This excludes an award for emotional
27
distress and punitive damages because they not available under contract law. See Erlich v. Menezes,
28
21 Cal. 4th 543, 558 (1999); Quigley v. Pet, Inc., 162 Cal. App. 3d 877, 887 (Ct. App. 1984).
FINAL JUDGMENT
Case No. C-12-2344-RMW
SW
-1-
1
2
Based on the evidence presented, the court is satisfied that plaintiff Teresa Zazenski, has
proven the following damages:
3
•
$63,141.33 for total lost wages from March 31, 2011, through April 16, 2012;
4
•
$11,918.04 for unused vacation days, promised paid severance days, worked holidays, and
5
unused sick leave;
6
•
$9,296.43 for unreimbursed business expenses;
7
•
$1,000 for the promised and unpaid technology allowance;
8
•
$8,550 for lost unemployment benefits.
9
1
The court declines to award further damages or attorney’s fees. The court accepts that Mrs.
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
Zazenski could have provided additional testimony about the interest on her house, the value of
11
Social Vista, and the emotional distress she suffered from not being paid. The court also accepts
12
that Mr. Zazenski would have similarly testified as counsel represented. Nevertheless, Mrs.
13
Zazenski’s other theories of damages are simply too speculative and not sufficiently supported.
14
15
Therefore, the court orders that Teresa Zazenski is entitled to recover a total of $93,905.80
from Jillian Danner and the Social Vista, LLC.
16
17
18
19
20
Dated: October 4, 2013
_________________________________
Ronald M. Whyte
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
1
27
28
This number is lower than plaintiff requested because California only provides a maximum of
$450 per week for unemployment benefits and requires a one week waiting period before an
individual is eligible. The court calculates that there were 20 full weeks between the date Mrs.
Zazenski was let go and the date she got a new job. Thus her lost unemployment was 19 weeks *
$450.
FINAL JUDGMENT
Case No. C-12-2344-RMW
SW
-2-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?