AF Holdings, LLC v. Doe
Filing
33
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 31 Motion to Substitute Attorney. Attorney Brett Langdon Gibbs terminated.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/30/2013)
Case5:12-cv-02394-LHK Document31-1 Filed01/29/13 Page1 of 2
1
3
Brett L. Gibbs, Esq. (SBN 251000)
38 Miller Avenue, #263
Mill Valley, CA 94941
415-325-5900
blgibbs@wefightpiracy.com
4
Withdrawing Attorney for Plaintiff
5
Paul Duffy (Bar No. 224159)
Anti-Piracy Law Group
161 N. Clark St., Suite 3200
Chicago, IL 60601
Phone: 312-880-9160
E-mail: paduffy@antipiracylawgroup.com
2
6
7
8
Incoming Attorney for Plaintiff
9
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE
10
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
AF HOLDINGS LLC,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
v.
)
)
JOHN DOE,
)
)
Defendant.
)
)
____________________________________)
No. 5:12-cv-02394-LHK
[PROPOSED] ORDER GRANTING
MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AND
SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
THIS CAUSE is before the Court upon simultaneous motion for withdrawal of Plaintiff’s
Counsel Brett L. Gibbs and motion for substitution of Paul Duffy as Plaintiff’s Counsel.
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
THIS COURT has reviewed the Motion for Withdrawal and Substitution of Counsel,
relevant case law, and is otherwise fully advised on the premise. Accordingly,
IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Brett L. Gibbs’ Motion to Withdraw as Plaintiff’s Counsel
is GRANTED.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Paul Duffy’s Motion for Substitution as Plaintiff’s
Counsel is GRANTED.
Case5:12-cv-02394-LHK Document31-1 Filed01/29/13 Page2 of 2
1
2
3
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Paul Duffy is hereby recognized as counsel of record for
Plaintiff.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
4
5
6
Dated: ______________________________
January 30, 2013
_______________________________
LucyUnited States District Judge
H. Koh
United States District Judge
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
MOTION FOR WITHDRAWAL AND SUBSTITUTION OF COUNSEL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?