De Keczer v. Tetley USA, Inc

Filing 53

ORDER CLARIFYING REFERRAL TO MEDIATION; SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE. The court clarifies that the order referring this case to mediation filed 10/12/2012 remains in effect. The court extends the deadline to complete mediation to 12/20/20 13. The court schedules this case for a Case Management Conference on 11/22/2013. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement on or before 11/15/2013. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 10/9/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION DARYL DE KECZER, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-02409 EJD ORDER CLARIFYING REFERRAL TO MEDIATION; SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE Plaintiff(s), v. 13 TETLEY USA INC., 14 15 Defendant(s). / 16 17 On October 12, 2012, the court granted the parties’ stipulation and referred this matter to 18 mediation pursuant to ADR Local Rule 6 to be completed within “90 days from the date the Court 19 rules on Defendant’s dispositive motion to be filed.” See Docket Item No. 34. The court ruled on 20 Defendant’s dispositive motion on August 16, 2013. See Docket Item No. 47. It then denied the 21 parties’ subsequent stipulation again selecting mediation on September 26, 2013. See Docket Item 22 No. 52. 23 Since the court had already referred this case to mediation, the court construed the parties’ 24 second stipulation as simply a request to extend the deadline by which mediation must be 25 completed, and under that interpretation, denied the request for extension. The court did not intend 26 to disturb the prior order. 27 28 Accordingly, the court clarifies that the order referring this case to mediation filed October 12, 2012, remains in effect. As such, mediation should have been completed on or before November 1 Case No. 5:12-cv-04209 EJD ORDER CLARIFYING REFERRAL TO MEDIATION; SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE 1 14, 2013, which is 90 days from the date the court ruled on the dispositive motion. However, in 2 light of this clarification, the court extends the deadline to complete mediation to December 20, 3 2013. 4 In addition, the court schedules this case for a Case Management Conference on November 5 22, 2013. The parties shall file a Joint Case Management Statement which proposes, inter alia, 6 actual dates1 for a case schedule on or before November 15, 2013. 7 IT IS SO ORDERED. 8 9 Dated: October 9, 2013 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 In other words, the parties should not simply propose that the court postpone setting case management deadlines due to the pendency of a motion to dismiss. The court will set actual deadlines, either way. 2 Case No. 5:12-cv-04209 EJD ORDER CLARIFYING REFERRAL TO MEDIATION; SCHEDULING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?