De Keczer v. Tetley USA, Inc

Filing 69

ORDER RE: STATEMENTS OF RECENT DECISION re 68 Statement of Recent Decision filed by Tetley USA, Inc. Since this district's Civil Local Rules do not provide for the filing of Statements of Recent Decision after a motion's noticed hearing date, the parties to this action shall not file any further Statements of Recent Decision with regard to the currently pending Motion to Dismiss. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/25/2014. (ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/25/2014)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION
DARYL DE KECZER, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

11
12
13

CASE NO. 5:12-cv-02409 EJD
ORDER RE: STATEMENTS OF RECENT
DECISION

Plaintiff(s),
For the Northern District of California

United States District Court

10

v.
TETLY USA, INC.,

14
Defendant(s).
15
16

/
Since this district’s Civil Local Rules do not provide for the filing of Statements of Recent

17

Decision after a motion’s noticed hearing date,1 the parties to this action shall not file any further

18

Statements of Recent Decision with regard to the currently pending Motion to Dismiss.

19

IT IS SO ORDERED.

20
21

Dated: July 25, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge

22
23
24
25
26
1

27
28

“Before the noticed hearing date, counsel may bring to the Court’s attention a relevant
judicial opinion published after the date the opposition or reply was filed by filing and serving a
Statement of Recent Decision, containing a citation to and providing a copy of the new
opinion–without argument.” Civ. L. R. 7-3(d)(2).
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-02409 EJD
ORDER RE: STATEMENTS OF RECENT DECISION