Kane v. Chobani, Inc

Filing 49

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 45 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/12/2013)

Download PDF
Case5:12-cv-02425-LHK Document45-1 Filed02/11/13 Page1 of 3 1 2 3 4 5 6 MAYER BROWN LLP Dale J. Giali (SBN 150382) dgiali@mayerbrown.com Michael L. Resch (SBN 202909) mresch@mayerbrown.com 350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503 Telephone: (213) 229-9500 Facsimile: (213) 625-0248 Attorneys for Defendant CHOBANI, INC. 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 KATIE KANE, et al., individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, 13 14 15 v. CHOBANI, INC., Defendant. 16 Case No. CV 12-02425-LHK [PROPOSED] ORDER ON JOINT STIPULATION RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE ON PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION Complaint filed: May 14, 2012 17 Judge: Hon. Lucy H. Koh 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE; CV 12-02425-LHK 705196547.1 Case5:12-cv-02425-LHK Document45-1 Filed02/11/13 Page2 of 3 ORDER 1 2 3 4 5 The Court, having considered the stipulation of the Parties (Dkt. #45), and for good cause shown, orders as follows: (1) Defendant Chobani, Inc. shall have until April 15, 2013 to file opposition to Plaintiffs’ motion for a preliminary injunction (Dkt. #44). 6 (2) Plaintiffs shall have until June 14, 2013 to file their reply. 7 (3) The hearing date on Plaintiffs' motion for preliminary injunction will be July The August 29, 2013 hearing date is 8 11, p.m. 1:302013 at 1:30 p.m. (4) The Parties reserve all rights, including seeking further modifications 9 to this schedule. 10 11 IT IS SO ORDERED. 12 13 14 DATED: February 12, 2013 _________________________________ The Honorable Lucy H. Koh U.S. District Court Judge 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 ORDER RE BRIEFING SCHEDULE; CV 12-02425-LHK 705196547.1

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?