Kane v. Chobani, Inc

Filing 95

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 93 Motion for Leave to File.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/24/2013)

Case5:12-cv-02425-LHK Document93-1 Filed04/22/13 Page1 of 3

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9

Mayer Brown LLP
Dale J. Giali (SBN 150382)
[e-mail]
Michael L. Resch (SBN 202909)
[e-mail]
Steven E. Rich (SBN 198412)
[e-mail]
Andrew Z. Edelstein (SBN 218023)
[e-mail]
350 South Grand Avenue, 25th Floor
Los Angeles, CA 90071-1503
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: [phone]
Attorneys for Defendant
CHOBANI, INC.

10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

11

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

12

SAN JOSE DIVISION

13
14
15
16
17
18

KATIE KANE, et al., individuals, on behalf
themselves and all others similarly situated,
Plaintiffs,
v.
CHOBANI, INC.
Defendant.

19

Case No. CV 12-02425-LHK
[proposed]
ORDER GRANTING DEFENDANT
CHOBANI, INC’S REQUEST FOR
LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL
BRIEF ADDRESSING THE IMPACT OF
PEREZ V. NIDEK RE CHOBANI’S
PENDING MOTION TO DISMISS
Date: March 28, 2013
Time: 1:30 p.m.
Dept.: Judge Koh, Ctrm 8

20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
CASE NO. CV 12-02425-LHK
706221781.1

Case5:12-cv-02425-LHK Document93-1 Filed04/22/13 Page2 of 3

ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF

1
2

Within 7 days of this Order, the parties on each side shall file a brief, not to exceed five

3

pages, regarding the relevance of the Ninth Circuit’s recent decision in Perez v. Nidek Co., Ltd.,

4

-- F.3d --, 2013 WL 1189098 (9th Cir. 2013), to this case, particularly in regard to whether the

5

Ninth Circuit’s decision impacts whether any of Kane’s claims should be subject to implied

6

preemption.

7
8

Dated: April 24,2013
, 2013

9
10

Lucy H. Koh
U.S. District Court Judge

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

-1ORDER GRANTING LEAVE TO FILE SUPPLEMENTAL BRIEF
CASE NO. CV 12-02425-LHK
706221781.1