Ivie v. Kraft Foods Global, Inc. et al

Filing 62

ORDER 58 Continuing Hearing Date and Case Management Conference and Setting Briefing Scheule for Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. Set/Reset Deadlines as to 56 MOTION to Dismiss Second Amended Complaint. M otion Hearing set for 6/28/2013 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Case Management Conference set for 6/28/2013 10:30 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/3/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/3/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 11 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 12 13 14 15 16 17 SUSAN IVIE, individually and on behalf of all others similarly situated, Plaintiff, vs. KRAFT FOODS GLOBAL, INC. and CADBURY ADAMS USA LLC, Defendants. No. CV 12-02554-RMW (PSG) [] ORDER CONTINUING HEARING DATE AND CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCE AND SETTING BRIEFING SCHEDULE FOR DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT Action Filed: May 17, 2012 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 [] ORDER SETTING MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING, CMC, AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE 1 ORDER 2 Pursuant to the stipulation of the parties, and good cause appearing, the Court hereby orders that: 3 1. Plaintiff’s response to the motion to dismiss shall be filed on or before May 24, 2013. 4 2. Defendants’ reply brief shall be filed on or before June 14, 2013. 5 3. Defendants’ motion to dismiss shall be heard by the Court at 9:00 a.m. on June 28, 2013. 6 4. The case management conference currently scheduled for June 14, 2013 shall be continued 7 8 to 9:00 a.m. on June 28, 2013. IT IS SO ORDERED. 9 10 DATED: , 2013 ___________________________ 11 The Honorable Ronald M. Whyte U.S. District Court Judge 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 1 [] ORDER SETTING MOTION TO DISMISS HEARING, CMC, AND BRIEFING SCHEDULE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?