Franklin et al v. Burbank

Filing 14

STIPULATION AND ORDER 13 to Dismiss Appeal. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/19/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP BENNETT G. YOUNG (Bar No. 106504), byoung@jmbm.com Two Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor San Francisco, California 94111-3813 Telephone: (415) 398-8080 Facsimile: (415) 398-5584 4 5 Attorneys for Appellee and Cross-Appellant RUSSELL K. BURBANK 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 IN RE: CASE NO. 12 CEDAR FUNDING INC., (Appeal from In re Cedar Funding, Inc., Bankr. N.D. Cal (San Jose) Case No. 08-52709 CN) 13 5:12-cv-02640 RMW Debtor. 14 STIPULATION PAUL J. FRANKLIN, et al., TO DISMISS APPEAL 15 Appellant(s), 16 v. 17 RUSSELL K. BURBANK, 18 Respondent(s). 19 20 21 Appellants and Cross-Appellees Paul J. Franklin, III; Albert L. Huff; Gail T. Huff; 22 Roger Pallastrine; Michelle Pallastrine; Linda M. Parise and Alene A. Perry and Appellee and 23 Cross-Appellant Russell K. Burbank hereby stipulate to dismiss the appeal and cross appeal with 24 prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8001(c)(2), with each side to bear its 25 own costs. 26 27 28 PRINTED ON 29 RECYCLED PAPER 1 STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL 1 DATED: October 22, 2013 JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP BENNETT G. YOUNG 2 3 By: /s/ Bennett G. Young BENNETT G. YOUNG Attorneys for Appellee and Cross-Appellant RUSSELL K. BURBANK 4 5 6 DATED: October 22, 2013 7 LARRY J. LICHTENEGGER VINCENT C. CATANIA 8 9 By: /s/ Larry J. Lichtenegger LARRY J. LICHTENEGGER Attorneys for Appellants PAUL J. FRANKLIN, III, ALBERT L. HUFF, GAIL T. HUFF, ROGER PALLESTRINE, MICHELLE PALLESTRINE, LINDA M. PARISE, and ALENE M. PERRY 10 11 12 13 14 SO ORDERED: 15 16 17 _______________________ United States District Judge 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 PRINTED ON 29 RECYCLED PAPER 2 STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?