Franklin et al v. Burbank
Filing
14
STIPULATION AND ORDER 13 to Dismiss Appeal. ***Civil Case Terminated. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/19/13. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/19/2013)
1
2
3
JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
BENNETT G. YOUNG (Bar No. 106504), byoung@jmbm.com
Two Embarcadero Center, Fifth Floor
San Francisco, California 94111-3813
Telephone:
(415) 398-8080
Facsimile:
(415) 398-5584
4
5
Attorneys for Appellee and Cross-Appellant RUSSELL K.
BURBANK
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
IN RE:
CASE NO.
12
CEDAR FUNDING INC.,
(Appeal from In re Cedar Funding, Inc., Bankr.
N.D. Cal (San Jose) Case No. 08-52709 CN)
13
5:12-cv-02640 RMW
Debtor.
14
STIPULATION
PAUL J. FRANKLIN, et al.,
TO DISMISS APPEAL
15
Appellant(s),
16
v.
17
RUSSELL K. BURBANK,
18
Respondent(s).
19
20
21
Appellants and Cross-Appellees Paul J. Franklin, III; Albert L. Huff; Gail T. Huff;
22
Roger Pallastrine; Michelle Pallastrine; Linda M. Parise and Alene A. Perry and Appellee and
23
Cross-Appellant Russell K. Burbank hereby stipulate to dismiss the appeal and cross appeal with
24
prejudice pursuant to Federal Rule of Bankruptcy Procedure 8001(c)(2), with each side to bear its
25
own costs.
26
27
28
PRINTED ON
29
RECYCLED PAPER
1
STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL
1
DATED: October 22, 2013
JEFFER MANGELS BUTLER & MITCHELL LLP
BENNETT G. YOUNG
2
3
By: /s/ Bennett G. Young
BENNETT G. YOUNG
Attorneys for Appellee and Cross-Appellant RUSSELL
K. BURBANK
4
5
6
DATED: October 22, 2013
7
LARRY J. LICHTENEGGER
VINCENT C. CATANIA
8
9
By: /s/ Larry J. Lichtenegger
LARRY J. LICHTENEGGER
Attorneys for Appellants PAUL J. FRANKLIN, III,
ALBERT L. HUFF, GAIL T. HUFF, ROGER
PALLESTRINE, MICHELLE PALLESTRINE,
LINDA M. PARISE, and ALENE M. PERRY
10
11
12
13
14
SO ORDERED:
15
16
17
_______________________
United States District Judge
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
PRINTED ON
29
RECYCLED PAPER
2
STIPULATION TO DISMISS APPEAL
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?