Franklin et al v. Burbank
Filing
9
ORDER staying appeal. Signed by Judge Whyte on 4/4/2013. (rmwlc2, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/4/2013)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
8
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9
SAN JOSE DIVISION
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
PAUL J. FRANKLIN, et al.,
Appellants,
12
13
14
15
Case No. C-12-02640-RMW
ORDER STAYING APPEAL
v.
RUSSELL K. BURBANK,
Respondent.
16
17
On March 26, 2013, the court issued an order to show cause why the parties' appeals should
18
not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. Dkt. No. 7. On March 27, 2013, the parties filed a joint
19
statement with the court notifying it that they were in talks to settle the entire case, including the
20
appeals at issue here and requested a stay. Dkt. No. 8. Therefore, the court stays the appeal and
21
cross appeal until May 31, 2013. The parties are ordered to file a joint report advising the court on
22
the status of the case, prospect of further settlement talks, and a recommendation of whether the stay
23
should be vacated and a proposed briefing schedule by the earlier of two weeks of the termination of
24
the judicial settlement conference or May 31, 2013.
25
26
Dated: April 4, 2013
_________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge
27
28
ORDER STAYING APPEAL
CASE NO. C-12-02646-RMW
SW
-1-
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?