Lanovaz v. Twinings North America, Inc

Filing 63

STIPULATION AND ORDER 61 of Litigation Schedule: Motion Hearing set for 4/11/2014 09:00 AM in Courtroom 6, 4th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Ronald M. Whyte. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 6/27/13. (jg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/27/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

WILLIAM L. STERN (CA SBN 96105)
[e-mail]
CLAUDIA M. VETESI (CA SBN 233485)
[e-mail]
LISA A. WONGCHENKO (CA SBN 281782)
[e-mail]
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP
425 Market Street
San Francisco, California 94105-2482
Telephone: [phone]
Facsimile: 415.268.7522
Attorneys for Defendant
TWININGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.

8
9

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

10

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

11

SAN JOSE DIVISION

12
13

NANCY LANOVAZ, on behalf of herself and
all others similarly situated,

Case No. CV12-02646-RMW
CLASS ACTION

14
Plaintiff,

JOINT LITIGATION
SCHEDULE AND [] ORDER

15
v.
16
TWININGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.,
17
Defendant.
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT LITIGATION SCHEDULE
CASE NO. CV-12-02646-RMW
sf-3288117

Judge: Hon. Ronald M. Whyte
Action Filed: May 23, 2012

1

The parties, Nancy Lanovaz (“Plaintiff”) and Twinings North America, Inc. (“Twinings”

2

or “Defendant”) submit this Joint Proposed Litigation Schedule pursuant to this Court’s May 10,

3

2013 docket entry. (Dkt. 57.)

4

1)

5

The parties jointly propose the following litigation schedule:

6

Deadline to Exchange Initial Disclosures:

June 10, 2013

7

Plaintiff’s Motion for Class Certification:

November 15, 2013

8

Defendant’s Opposition:

February 14, 2014

9

Plaintiff’s Reply:

March 14, 2014

10

Hearing on Class Certification:

April 11, 2014

11

The parties will begin the discovery process immediately. Defendant intends to file an

LITIGATION SCHEDULE

12

early motion for summary judgment focused on Ms. Lanovaz in her individual capacity on or

13

before April 11, 2014.

14

2)

15

The parties have agreed to mediation, and the Court has ordered that it occur within 90

16

days of the ruling on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint. (Dkt. 28.)

17

The parties have conducted two phone conferences with the Court’s ADR representative, and all

18

parties concluded that, in light of the Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint, the

19

mediation should occur within 90 days of the ruling on this motion, rather than the prior motion.

20

The parties respectfully request that the Court agree to this extension.

SETTLEMENT AND ADR

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT LITIGATION SCHEDULE
CASE NO. CV-12-02646-RMW

1

1

Dated: May 24, 2013

BEN F. PIERCE GORE
PRATT & ASSOCIATES

2
3

By:

4

/s/ Ben F. Pierce Gore
Ben F. Pierce Gore
Attorneys for Plaintiff
NANCY LANOVAZ

5
6
7
8
9

Dated: May 24, 2013

10

WILLIAM L. STERN
CLAUDIA M. VETESI
LISA A. WONGCHENKO
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

11
By:

12
13

/s/ William L. Stern
William L. Stern
Attorneys for Defendant
TWININGS NORTH AMERICA, INC.

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT LITIGATION SCHEDULE
CASE NO. CV-12-02646-RMW
sf-3200663

2

1
2

ECF ATTESTATION
I, William L. Stern, am the ECF User whose ID and password are being used to file the

3

following: JOINT PROPOSED LITIGATION SCHEDULE. In compliance with General

4

Order 45, X.B., I hereby attest that Ben F. Pierce Gore has concurred in this filing.

5
6

WILLIAM L. STERN
CLAUDIA M. VETESI
LISA A. WONGCHENKO
MORRISON & FOERSTER LLP

Dated: May 24, 2013

7
8

By: /s/ William L. Stern
WILLIAM L. STERN

9
10
11
12
13

[] ORDER

14

PURSUANT TO THE PARTIES PROPOSAL, IT IS SO ORDERED.

15
16

DATED: ______________________

17

______________________________________
RONALD M. WHYTE
United States District Judge

18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
JOINT LITIGATION SCHEDULE
CASE NO. CV-12-02646-RMW
sf-3200663

3