Securities And Exchange Commission v. GLR Capital Management, LLC et al

Filing 136

ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING. The hearing on 77 Motion for Appointment of a Receiver is CONTINUED to a special setting on 1/27/2014 at 9:00 a.m. The court advises that only the named parties to this action will be allowed to enter an appearance and present argument at the motion hearing. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/14/2014. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 4 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 5 SAN JOSE DIVISION 6 SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION, CASE NO. 5:12-cv-02663 EJD 7 ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING Plaintiff(s), 8 v. 9 GLR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC, Defendant(s). 11 / For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 13 Having reviewed the matter, the court has determined that the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion 14 for Appointment of a Receiver (Docket Item No. 77) will require more time than the court’s civil 15 motion calendar can accommodate. Accordingly, the hearing on the Motion is CONTINUED from 16 January 17, 2014, to a special setting on January 27, 2014, at 9:00 a.m. 17 In addition, the court notes that pleadings in opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion have been filed 18 by certain individuals who are not parties to this action. See Docket Item Nos. 129, 130, 133. 19 While the court appreciates the interest of these individuals, it nonetheless advises that only the 20 named parties to this action will be allowed to enter an appearance and present argument at the 21 motion hearing. 22 23 A copy of this order shall also be filed in Case No. 5:13-cv-01290 EJD. IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: January 14, 2014 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-02663 EJD ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?