Securities And Exchange Commission v. GLR Capital Management, LLC et al
Filing
136
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING. The hearing on 77 Motion for Appointment of a Receiver is CONTINUED to a special setting on 1/27/2014 at 9:00 a.m. The court advises that only the named parties to this action will be allowed to enter an appearance and present argument at the motion hearing. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/14/2014. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/14/2014)
1
2
3
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
4
FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
5
SAN JOSE DIVISION
6
SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE
COMMISSION,
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-02663 EJD
7
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION
HEARING
Plaintiff(s),
8
v.
9
GLR CAPITAL MANAGEMENT LLC,
Defendant(s).
11
/
For the Northern District of California
United States District Court
10
12
13
Having reviewed the matter, the court has determined that the hearing on Plaintiff’s Motion
14
for Appointment of a Receiver (Docket Item No. 77) will require more time than the court’s civil
15
motion calendar can accommodate. Accordingly, the hearing on the Motion is CONTINUED from
16
January 17, 2014, to a special setting on January 27, 2014, at 9:00 a.m.
17
In addition, the court notes that pleadings in opposition to Plaintiff’s Motion have been filed
18
by certain individuals who are not parties to this action. See Docket Item Nos. 129, 130, 133.
19
While the court appreciates the interest of these individuals, it nonetheless advises that only the
20
named parties to this action will be allowed to enter an appearance and present argument at the
21
motion hearing.
22
23
A copy of this order shall also be filed in Case No. 5:13-cv-01290 EJD.
IT IS SO ORDERED.
24
25
Dated: January 14, 2014
EDWARD J. DAVILA
United States District Judge
26
27
28
1
CASE NO. 5:12-cv-02663 EJD
ORDER CONTINUING MOTION HEARING
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?