Werdebaugh-v-Blue Diamond Growers
Filing
18
Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 17 Stipulation. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/28/2012)
Case5:12-cv-02724-LHK Document17 Filed08/24/12 Page1 of 3
1 HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
LAWRENCE M. CIRELLI, SBN 114710
2 lcirelli@hansonbridgett.com
SUSAN G. O'NEILL, SBN 115133
3 soneill@hansonbridgett.com
MEGAN OLIVER THOMPSON, SBN 256654
4 moliverthompson@hansonbridgett.com
GEOFFREY R. PITTMAN, SBN 253876
5 gpittman@hansonbridgett.com
425 Market Street, 26th Floor
6 San Francisco, California 94105
Telephone: (415) 777-3200
7 Facsimile: (415) 541-9366
8 Attorneys for Blue Diamond Growers
9
10
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
11
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION
12
13 CHRIS WERDEBAUGH, individually and
on behalf of all others similarly situated,
14
Plaintiff,
15
v.
16
BLUE DIAMOND GROWERS,
17
Defendant.
18
19
CASE NO. CV12-02724-LHK
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED]
ORDER CONTINUING SEPTEMBER 12,
2012 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Pursuant to Civil Local Rules 6-2 and 16-2(e), Plaintiff Chris Werdebaugh, on
20 behalf of himself and all others similarly situated, and Defendant Blue Diamond Growers
21 ("Blue Diamond"), through their undersigned counsel, hereby stipulate as follows:
22
WHEREAS, Blue Diamond was served with the summons and plaintiff's complaint
23 (the "Complaint") on June 28, 2012;
24
WHEREAS, pursuant to the parties' two prior stipulations, the current deadline for
25 Blue Diamond to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is September 4, 2012;
26
WHEREAS, pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 26, the current deadline
27 for the parties to submit their Joint Case Management Statement and to exchange initial
28 disclosures is September 5, 2012;
4693783.1
CV12-02724
-1STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Case5:12-cv-02724-LHK Document17 Filed08/24/12 Page2 of 3
1
WHEREAS, the initial case management conference is currently scheduled for
2 September 12, 2012 at 2:00 p.m.;
3
WHEREAS, given that Blue Diamond's responsive pleading is due just one day
4 before the parties' Joint Case Management Statement is due, the parties agree that
5 additional time is needed to meet and confer to prepare their Joint Case Management
6 Statement, to prepare their initial disclosures, and to otherwise prepare for the initial case
7 management conference;
8
WHEREAS, the date of the initial case management conference has not
9 previously been adjusted;
10
THEREFORE, the parties stipulate and agree, and respectfully request the Court
11 to order, as follows:
12
The initial case management conference is continued to October 24, 2012 at 2:00
13 p.m. All related deadlines, including those deadlines for completing the 26(f) conference,
14 the Joint Case Management Statement, and initial disclosures, are extended accordingly.
15
16 DATED: August 24, 2012
HANSON BRIDGETT LLP
17
18
By: /S/ Megan Oliver Thompson1
LAWRENCE M. CIRELLI
SUSAN G. O'NEILL
MEGAN OLIVER THOMPSON
GEOFFREY R. PITTMAN
Attorneys for Blue Diamond Growers
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
1
Pursuant to Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Megan Oliver Thompson - the ECF User whose
26 User ID and Password are used in the filing of this Stipulation Continuing September 12,
2012 Case Management Conference - hereby attest that concurrence in the filing of this
27 document has been obtained from each of its signatories.
28
4693783.1
CV12-02724
-2STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Case5:12-cv-02724-LHK Document17 Filed08/24/12 Page3 of 3
1 DATED: August 24, 2012
2
3
Ben F. Pierce Gore
PRATT & ASSOCIATES
1901 S. Bascom Avenue, Suite 350
Campbell, CA 95008
4
5
By: /S/ Ben Pierce Gore
BEN F. PIERCE GORE
Attorney for Plaintiff
6
7
8
9
ORDER
PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED
10
August 28, 2012
11 DATED: _________________, 2012
12
13
HONORABLE LUCY H. KOH
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
4693783.1
CV12-02724
-3STIP. AND [PROPOSED] ORDER CONTINUING SEPTEMBER 12, 2012 CASE MANAGEMENT
CONFERENCE
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?