Marble Bridge Funding Group, Inc v. Euler Hermes American Credit Indemnity Company

Filing 62

ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES. The parties shall participate in an ENE on or before March 1, 2013, unless the deadline is otherwise extended by the court upon a showing of good cause; If the ENE proves unsuccessful, Euler Hermes Americ an Credit Indemnity Company shall promptly thereafter request entry of default from the clerk against Nature's Own, Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) in case number 12-2729; Any party requesting a stay of these actions due t o the pendency of criminal proceedings shall file and serve a noticed motion requesting such relief or present an appropriate stipulation for consideration by the court; Any disputes concerning discovery or disclosure, including the apparent dispute related to the transfer of documents to criminal defense counsel, are referred to the assigned magistrate judge who is available to hear motions to compel; Updated Joint Case Management Statements due by 4/26/2013. Case Management Conference set for 5/3/2013 10:00 AM in Courtroom 4, 5th Floor, San Jose before Hon. Edward J. Davila. Please see Order for further specifics. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 2/20/2013.(ecg, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 2/20/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 8 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 SAN JOSE DIVISION CASE NOS. 5:12-cv-01839 EJD; 5:12-cv-02729 EJD MARBLE BRIDGE FUNDING GROUP, INC., 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 12 ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES Plaintiff(s), v. 13 14 NATURES OWN PHARMACY, LLC, et. al., 15 Defendant(s). 16 / 17 18 MARBLE BRIDGE FUNDING GROUP, INC., 19 Plaintiff(s), 20 21 v. EULER HERMES AMERICAN CREDIT INDEMNITY COMPANY,, 22 23 Defendant(s). / 24 25 Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Case Management Conference Statement filed in case 26 number 5:12-cv-02729 (see Docket Item No. 61) and considering the parties’ desire to attempt 27 resolution of these actions through Early Neutral Evaluation (“ENE”), the court finds that a Case 28 Management Conference is premature at this time. Accordingly, the Case Management Conferences 1 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01839 EJD; 5:12-cv-02729 EJD ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES 1 scheduled for February 22, 2013, are each CONTINUED to May 3, 2013, at 10:00 a.m. subject to 2 the following orders: 3 1. 4 5 The parties shall participate in an ENE on or before March 1, 2013, unless the deadline is otherwise extended by the court upon a showing of good cause; 2. If the ENE proves unsuccessful, Euler Hermes American Credit Indemnity Company 6 shall promptly thereafter request entry of default from the clerk against Nature’s 7 Own, Inc. pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 55(a) in case number 12-2729; 8 3. 9 proceedings shall file and serve a noticed motion requesting such relief or present an For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 11 Any party requesting a stay of these actions due to the pendency of criminal appropriate stipulation for consideration by the court; 4. Any disputes concerning discovery or disclosure, including the apparent dispute 12 related to the transfer of documents to criminal defense counsel, are referred to the 13 assigned magistrate judge who is available to hear motions to compel; 14 5. Unless both actions are settled or stayed, the parties shall file an updated Joint Case 15 Management Statement in both cases on or before April 26, 2013, which provides, 16 inter alia, a proposed schedule for each case. The parties are notified that the court 17 will issue scheduling orders at the continued Case Management Conferences should 18 they proceed. 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 21 Dated: February 20, 2013 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-01839 EJD; 5:12-cv-02729 EJD ORDER CONTINUING CASE MANAGEMENT CONFERENCES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?