Geetesh v. Capital One,N.A. et al

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER 34 Re: Expert Discovery Cutoff. Signed by Judge Ronald M. Whyte on 11/15/12. (jgS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 11/15/2012)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Suzanne S. Storm (State Bar No. 229003)
David J. Sire, Jr. (State Bar No. 255798)
ATTLESEY | STORM, LLP
2552 Walnut Avenue, Suite 100
Tustin, CA 92780
Tel: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant ING Bank FSB erroneously named as CAPITAL ONE, N.A.,
successor in interest to ING BANK FSB

9
10

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT, NORTHERN DISTRICT OF
CALIFORNIA – SAN JOSE DIVISION

11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28

GEETESH GOYAL,

)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
vs.
)
)
CAPITAL ONE, N.A., successor in
)
interest to ING BANK, FSB;
)
INTEGRATED LENDER SERVICES,
)
INC.; and DOES 1 through 100, inclusive )
)
Defendants.
)
)

CASE NO.: CV 12-02759 RMW
STIPULATION AND ()
ORDER RE: EXPERT DISCOVERY
CUTOFF

Plaintiff GEETESH GOYAL (“GOYAL”) and Defendant ING Bank FSB
erroneously named as CAPITAL ONE, N.A., successor in interest to ING BANK FSB
(“ING”) (collectively “Parties”) by and through their counsel of record have entered
into the following Stipulation respectfully requesting an Order from this honorable
court as follows:
WHEREAS on or about June 12, 2012 Defendant INTEGRATED LENDER
SERVICES, INC., filed a Declaration of Non-monetary Status that was not objected
PAGE 1
STIPULATION AND () ORDER RE: EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF

1

to making it a nominal party to these proceedings;

2

WHEREAS counsel for Plaintiff GOYAL and Defendant ING met and

3

conferred pursuant to Local Rule 16 and the Order Setting Initial Case Management

4

Conference to prepare a Joint Case Management Schedule and Joint Rule 26(f) report;

5

WHEREAS a Case Management Conference was held on September 7, 2012,

6

during which the Court set a schedule for this matter as reflected in the Order After

7

Hearing (see Exhibit “A” attached), and the Notice of Order After Case Management

8

Conference (see Exhibit “B” attached);

9

WHEREAS the Order After Hearing and Notice of Order After Case

10

Management Conference mistakenly identify the date for both the Disclosure of

11

Experts and Expert Discovery Cutoff as December 3, 2012;

12

WHEREAS both the Order After Case Management Conference and Notice of

13

Order After Case Management appear to have a clerical error making both the expert

14

witness designation and cut-off for expert witness discovery December 3, 2012;

15

WHEREAS the Parties intended to follow Local Rule 37-3 making the expert

16

witness discovery cutoff and regular discovery cutoff date both December 21, 2012,

17

thus permitting some discovery on any experts identified by the Parties on December

18

3, 2012.

19

///

20

///

21

///

22

///

23

///

24

///

25

///

26

///

27

///

28

///
PAGE 2
STIPULATION AND () ORDER RE: EXPERT DISCOVERY CUTOFF