Tillman v. Bostick et al

Filing 23

ORDER SUA SPONTE APPOINTING COUNSEL. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on 4/8/13. (Attachments: # 1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(mpb, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 4/9/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EDDIE A. TILLMAN, 11 Plaintiff, 12 13 v. OFFICER BOSTICK, 14 Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) No. C 12-2807 LHK (PR) ORDER SUA SPONTE APPOINTING COUNSEL 15 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights complaint under 42 U.S.C. 17 ยง 1983, arguing that Defendant used excessive force upon him, in violation of the Eighth 18 Amendment. On January 28, 2013, Defendant filed a notice that he believed the case was not 19 suitable for summary judgment. The Court then referred this case to Magistrate Judge Nandor 20 Vadas for mediation. On April 3, 2013, Judge Vadas reported that the case did not settle. 21 It appears that this case will be tried. The Court concludes that counsel should be 22 appointed, and refers this matter to the Federal Pro Bono Project to find counsel. Upon an 23 attorney being located to represent Plaintiff, that attorney shall be appointed as counsel for 24 Plaintiff in this matter until further order of the Court. All proceedings in this action are stayed 25 until four weeks from the date an attorney is appointed to represent Plaintiff. 26 27 28 IT IS SO ORDERED. DATED: 4/8/13 LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge Order Sua Sponte Appointing Counsel G:\PRO-SE\SJ.LHK\CR.12\Tillman807refprobono.wpd

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?