GPNE Corp. v. Apple Inc.
Filing
526
ORDER ON HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS TO CLOSING SLIDES. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on October 20, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014)
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
9
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
SAN JOSE DIVISION
11
12
GPNE CORP.,
Plaintiff,
13
14
v.
APPLE, INC.,
15
Defendant.
16
17
18
I.
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
Case No.: 12-CV-02885-LHK
ORDER RE: HIGH-PRIORITY
OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES
GPNE’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S CLOSING SLIDES
GPNE has filed objections to Apple’s Closing Slides. ECF No. 519. Apple has filed a
19
response. ECF No. 518. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,
20
and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
21
GPNE’s objections as follows:
22
GPNE’S
OBJECTION
ADX 702, 703
ADX 715–17
ADX 718
ADX 740–41
ADX 742
ADX 743
ADX 744
ADX 748
ADX 770
23
24
25
26
27
28
COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Sustained.
Overruled.
Sustained as to “Expert or Advocate?” and otherwise overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
1
Case No.: 12-CV-02885-LHK
ORDER RE: HIGH-PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES
1
II.
2
APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO GPNE’S CLOSING SLIDES
Apple has filed objections to GPNE’s Closing Slides. ECF No. 518. GPNE has filed a
3
response. ECF No. 519. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case,
4
and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on
5
Apple’s objections as follows:
6
APPLE’S
OBJECTION
Slides 8, 39
Slides 36, 37
Slide 44
Slide 51
7
8
9
United States District Court
For the Northern District of California
10
11
Slide 54
Slide 63
Slide 66
COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Sustained as to the image of the man perjuring himself and “Apple didn’t copy.”
Otherwise overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
Overruled.
12
III.
13
14
15
SEALING
Apple requests to seal one of GPNE’s closing slides. ECF No. 518. Having considered
Apple’s motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following slide as
follows:
16
17
GPNE Slide
Slide 63
COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST
Granted as to the proposed redactions.
18
19
IT IS SO ORDERED.
20
Dated: October 20, 2014
_________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-02885-LHK
ORDER RE: HIGH-PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?