GPNE Corp. v. Apple Inc.

Filing 526

ORDER ON HIGH PRIORITY OBJECTIONS TO CLOSING SLIDES. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on October 20, 2014. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 10/20/2014)

Download PDF
1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 9 NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 SAN JOSE DIVISION 11 12 GPNE CORP., Plaintiff, 13 14 v. APPLE, INC., 15 Defendant. 16 17 18 I. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) Case No.: 12-CV-02885-LHK ORDER RE: HIGH-PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES GPNE’S OBJECTIONS TO APPLE’S CLOSING SLIDES GPNE has filed objections to Apple’s Closing Slides. ECF No. 519. Apple has filed a 19 response. ECF No. 518. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case, 20 and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on 21 GPNE’s objections as follows: 22 GPNE’S OBJECTION ADX 702, 703 ADX 715–17 ADX 718 ADX 740–41 ADX 742 ADX 743 ADX 744 ADX 748 ADX 770 23 24 25 26 27 28 COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION Overruled. Overruled. Overruled. Sustained. Overruled. Sustained as to “Expert or Advocate?” and otherwise overruled. Overruled. Overruled. Overruled. 1 Case No.: 12-CV-02885-LHK ORDER RE: HIGH-PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES 1 II. 2 APPLE’S OBJECTIONS TO GPNE’S CLOSING SLIDES Apple has filed objections to GPNE’s Closing Slides. ECF No. 518. GPNE has filed a 3 response. ECF No. 519. After reviewing the parties’ briefing, considering the record in the case, 4 and balancing the considerations set forth in Federal Rule of Evidence 403, the Court rules on 5 Apple’s objections as follows: 6 APPLE’S OBJECTION Slides 8, 39 Slides 36, 37 Slide 44 Slide 51 7 8 9 United States District Court For the Northern District of California 10 11 Slide 54 Slide 63 Slide 66 COURT’S RULING ON OBJECTION Overruled. Overruled. Overruled. Sustained as to the image of the man perjuring himself and “Apple didn’t copy.” Otherwise overruled. Overruled. Overruled. Overruled. 12 III. 13 14 15 SEALING Apple requests to seal one of GPNE’s closing slides. ECF No. 518. Having considered Apple’s motion, and compelling reasons having been shown, the Court seals the following slide as follows: 16 17 GPNE Slide Slide 63 COURT’S RULING ON SEALING REQUEST Granted as to the proposed redactions. 18 19 IT IS SO ORDERED. 20 Dated: October 20, 2014 _________________________________ LUCY H. KOH United States District Judge 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 2 Case No.: 12-CV-02885-LHK ORDER RE: HIGH-PRIORITY OBJECTIONS ON CLOSING SLIDES

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?