City of San Jose v. San Jose Police Officers Association et al

Filing 54

Order by Hon. Lucy H. Koh granting 53 Stipulation.(lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012)

Case5:12-cv-02904-LHK Document53 Filed07/24/12 Page1 of 5

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10

Gregg McLean Adam, No. 203436
Jonathan Yank, No. 215495
Gonzalo C. Martinez, No. 231724
Jennifer S. Stoughton, No. 238309
Amber L. West, No. 245002
CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP
Attorneys at Law
44 Montgomery Street, Suite 400
San Francisco, CA 94104
Telephone:
415.989.5900
Facsimile:
415.989.0932
Email:
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
[e-mail]
Attorneys for Defendant
San Jose Police Officers' Association (“SJPOA”)

11

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

12

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SAN JOSE DIVISION

13

CITY OF SAN JOSE,
Plaintiff,

14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21

v.

No. C12-02904 LHK PSG
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER
RE: CONSOLIDATED BRIEFING ON
MOTIONS TO DISMISS

SAN JOSE POLICE OFFICERS'
ASSOCIATION; SAN JOSE
FIREFIGHTERS; I.A.F.F., LOCAL
230; MUNICIPAL EMPLOYEES'
FEDERATION, AFSCME, LOCAL
101; CITY ASSOCIATION OF
MANAGEMENT PERSONNEL,
IFPTE, LOCAL 21, THE
INTERNATIONAL UNION OF
OPERATING ENGINEERS, LOCAL
NO. 3; and DOES 1-10,
Defendants.

22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CBM-SF\SF557284.2

STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

(NO. C12-02904 LHK PSG)

Case5:12-cv-02904-LHK Document53 Filed07/24/12 Page2 of 5

1

In accordance with the Court’s instruction, the parties have met and conferred

2

and although unable to reach a global agreement on a single consolidated Motion to

3

Dismiss, have reached an agreement to streamline and expedite the resolution of the

4

Motions to Dismiss as set forth below.

5
6

IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED by and among the
undersigned parties, by and through their counsel, that:

7
8
9
10

1. The hearing on all defendants’ Motions to Dismiss the First Amended Complaint
will occur on October 4, 2012.
2. Defendant Municipal Employees’ Federation, AFSCME, Local 101 may file a

11

separate Motion to Dismiss no later than August 3, 2012, presenting alternative

12

grounds for dismissal.

13
14

3. On or before August 20, 2012, the City of San Jose will file one consolidated
opposition brief to all Motions to Dismiss, not to exceed 45 pages.

15

4. Defendants will file one consolidated reply brief not to exceed 25 pages on or

16

before September 13, 2012, i.e., at least 21 days before the October 4 court

17

hearing on the motions.

18

5. Given the overlap in arguments and pressing deadlines relating to Measure B,

19

the parties respectfully request that the Court rule as soon as practicable after

20

the October 4 hearing on the motions.

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CBM-SF\SF557284.2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-2(NO. C12-02904 LHK PSG)

Case5:12-cv-02904-LHK Document53 Filed07/24/12 Page3 of 5

1

Dated: July __, 2012

2

CARROLL, BURDICK & McDONOUGH LLP

3
4

By

Gregg McLean Adam
Jonathan Yank
Gonzalo Martinez
Jennifer S. Stoughton
Amber L. West
Attorneys for Defendant
San Jose Police Officers' Association

5
6
7
8
9

Dated: July __, 2012

10

WYLIE McBRIDE PLATTEN & RENNER

11
12

By

John A. McBride
Christopher E. Platten
Mark S. Renner
Attorneys for Defendant
San Jose Firefighters, IAFF Local 230

13
14
15
16

Dated: July 24, 2012

17

BEESON TAYER & BODINE

18
19

By

Vishtasp Mehr Soroushian

20

Teague Pryde Paterson
Vishtasp Mehr Soroushian
Attorneys for Defendant
Municipal Employees’ Federation, AFSCME,
Local 101

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CBM-SF\SF557284.2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-3(NO. C12-02904 LHK PSG)

Case5:12-cv-02904-LHK Document53 Filed07/24/12 Page4 of 5

1

Dated: July __, 2012

2

WYLIE McBRIDE PLATTEN & RENNER

3
4

By

John A. McBride
Christopher E. Platten
Mark S. Renner
Attorneys for Defendant
City Association of Management Personnel,
IFPTE, Local 21

5
6
7
8
9

Dated: July __, 2012
WYLIE McBRIDE PLATTEN & RENNER

10
11

By

12

John A. McBride
Christopher E. Platten
Mark S. Renner
Attorneys for Defendant
International Union of Operating Engineers,
Local No. 3

13
14
15
16
17

Dated: July __, 2012
MEYERS, NAVE, RIBACK, SILVER
& WILSON

18
19
20

By

Michael Christian Hughes
Jennifer Lynne Nock
Linda Margaret Ross
Attorneys for Plaintiff
City of San Jose

21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CBM-SF\SF557284.2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-4(NO. C12-02904 LHK PSG)

Case5:12-cv-02904-LHK Document53 Filed07/24/12 Page5 of 5

1

PURSUANT TO STIPULATION, IT IS SO ORDERED.

2
3

Dated:

July 24, 2012

4
5

HON. LUCY H. KOH
United States District Court Judge

6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
CBM-SF\SF557284.2
STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER

-5(NO. C12-02904 LHK PSG)

Case5:12-cv-02904-LHK Document53-1 Filed07/24/12 Page1 of 4

Case5:12-cv-02904-LHK Document53-1 Filed07/24/12 Page2 of 4

Case5:12-cv-02904-LHK Document53-1 Filed07/24/12 Page3 of 4

Case5:12-cv-02904-LHK Document53-1 Filed07/24/12 Page4 of 4