Journay v. Robago et al

Filing 8

ORDER DISMISSING CASE. Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and the deadline to file such pleading has passed. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The Clerk of the Court shall close this file. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 7/24/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/24/2012) (Additional attachment(s) added on 7/24/2012: # 1 Certificate of Service) (ecg, COURT STAFF).

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-02910 EJD SCOTT CABIBI JOURNAY, 6 ORDER DISMISSING CASE Plaintiff(s), 7 8 v. ROBERT ROBAGO, et. al., 9 Defendant(s). 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 / On June 26, 2012, the court issued an Order which adopted the Report and Recommendation 12 of Magistrate Judge Paul S. Grewal and dismissed the Complaint filed by Plaintiff Scott Cabibi 13 Journay (“Plaintiff”) for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. See Docket Item No. 6. Plaintiff was 14 given leave to file an amended complaint no later than July 20, 2012, and was advised that failure to 15 file an amended pleading or failure to establish federal jurisdiction would result in a dismissal of this 16 action without further notice. Id. 17 As of the current date, Plaintiff has not filed an amended complaint and the deadline to file 18 such pleading has passed. Accordingly, this case is DISMISSED WITHOUT PREJUDICE for lack 19 of subject matter jurisdiction. Freeman v. Oakland Unified Sch. Dist., 179 F.3d 846, 847 (9th Cir. 20 1999) (“Dismissals for lack of jurisdiction should be . . . without prejudice so that a plaintiff may 21 reassert his claims in a competent court.” (internal quotations omitted)). The Clerk of the Court 22 shall close this file. 23 IT IS SO ORDERED. 24 25 Dated: July 24, 2012 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 26 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-02910 EJD ORDER DISMISSING CASE

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?