GPNE Corp. v. Amazon.com, Inc. et al

Filing 370

ORDER CLARIFYING THAT MAY 31, 2013 ORDER DENIED THE PARTIES REQUEST TO STAY THE CASE. Signed by Judge Lucy H. Koh on June 5, 2013. (lhklc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/5/2013)

1
2
3
4
5
6
7
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

8

NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

9

SAN JOSE DIVISION

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14

GNPE Corp.,
Plaintiff,
v.
Amazon.com, Inc.,
Defendant.

15
16
17

)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)
)

Case No.: 12-CV-03055-LHK
ORDER CLARIFYING THAT MAY 31,
2013 ORDER DENIED THE PARTIES’
REQUEST TO STAY THE CASE

On May 31, 2013, this Court issued an Order in which the Court stated that it was denying

18

GPNE Corp. and Amazon.com, Inc.’s request to stay the case. In the description of the Order on

19

the electronic case docket, the Court inadvertently described the order as an Order “granting” the

20

parties’ request for a stay. The Court clarifies that, as stated in the text of the May 31, 2013 Order,

21

GPNE and Amazon’s request to stay the case is DENIED.

22

As stated in the May 31, 2013 Order, the Court appreciates the parties’ efforts to resolve

23

their dispute and welcomes the parties’ news that they have reached an agreement in principle to

24

settle their respective claims. However, if the Court stays the case now, the Court will not to hold

25

another claim construction hearing if the parties’ settlement is not effectuated. Consequently, the

26

Court will not stay the parties’ case and encourages the parties to file their stipulation of dismissal

27

by Wednesday, June 5, 2013.

28
1
Case No.: 12-CV-02885-LHK
ORDER CLARIFYING THAT MAY 31, 2013 ORDER DENIED THE PARTIES’ REQUEST TO STAY THE CASE

1

IT IS SO ORDERED.

2

Dated: June 5, 2013

____________________________________
LUCY H. KOH
United States District Judge

3
4
5
6
7
8
9

United States District Court
For the Northern District of California

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
2
Case No.: 12-CV-02885-LHK
ORDER CLARIFYING THAT MAY 31, 2013 ORDER DENIED THE PARTIES’ REQUEST TO STAY THE CASE