Cuevas v. City of Campbell et al

Filing 35

ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION. This case is STAYED until a final ruling has been issued on Plaintiffs anticipated appeal. The clerk of the court shall administratively close this file. The parties shall provide notice to the court within one week of the issuance of the final appellate determination. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 1/15/2013. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 1/15/2013)

Download PDF
1 2 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 3 FOR THE NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 4 SAN JOSE DIVISION 5 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-03087 EJD SAMMY CUEVAS, 6 ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION Plaintiff(s), 7 8 v. CITY OF CAMPBELL, et. al., 9 Defendant(s). 11 For the Northern District of California United States District Court 10 / Having reviewed the parties’ Joint Status Statement (see Docket Item No. 34), the court finds 12 good cause to extend the previously-imposed stay of this action. Accordingly, the court issues the 13 following order: 14 1. This case is STAYED until a final ruling has been issued on Plaintiff’s anticipated 15 appeal from the state court’s order in the Writ of Administrative Mandamus 16 Proceeding; 17 2. clerk of the court shall administratively close this file. 18 19 Due to what may be a period of extended inactivity while the appeal progresses, the 3. The parties shall provide notice to the court within one week of the issuance of the 20 final appellate determination. In the notice, the parties shall request that this matter 21 be reopened and that a case management conference be scheduled. 22 23 24 4. This Order shall not prevent either party from seeking to reopen this case and lift or extend the stay should the circumstances warrant. IT IS SO ORDERED. 25 26 Dated: January 15, 2013 EDWARD J. DAVILA United States District Judge 27 28 1 CASE NO. 5:12-cv-03087 EJD ORDER EXTENDING STAY OF ACTION

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?