In re LinkedIn User Privacy Litigation

Filing 37

STIPULATION AND ORDER re 35 Extend Time to Respond to Complaint. Signed by Judge Edward J. Davila on 8/15/2012. (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 8/15/2012) Modified on 8/15/2012 (ejdlc1, COURT STAFF).

9
10
11
12
13
14
15

ER

R NIA

J. Davila

FO

d w a rd
J u d ge E

H

8

SEAN P. REIS (184044)
([e-mail])
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLP
30021 Tomas Street, Suite 300
Rancho Santa Margarita, California 92688
Telephone: [phone]

RT

7

NO

Attorneys for Defendant LINKEDIN CORPORATION
6

LI

5

A

4

RT
U
O

3

S

2

COOLEY LLP
MICHAEL G. RHODES (116127) ([e-mail])
S DISTRICT
MATTHEW D. BROWN (196972) ([e-mail])
TE
C
WHITTY SOMVICHIAN (216083) ([e-mail])TA
101 California Street, 5th Floor
San Francisco, CA 94111-5800
Telephone:
[phone]
TED
GRAN
Facsimile:
[phone]

UNIT
ED

1

N

F
D IS T IC T O
R

C

JAY EDELSON* ([e-mail])
RAFEY S. BALABANIAN* ([e-mail])
ARI J. SCHARG* ([e-mail])
CHRISTOPHER L. DORE* ([e-mail])
EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
350 North LaSalle Street, Suite 1300
Chicago, Illinois 60654
Telephone: [phone]
Fax: [phone]
Attorneys for Plaintiff
KATIE SZPYRKA

16
*Admitted pro hac vice
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
SAN JOSE DIVISION
Case No. 12-CV-3088 EJD

KATIE SZPYRKA, individually and on
behalf of all others similarly situated,

STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME TO
RESPOND TO COMPLAINT
(CIV. L.R. 6-1(a))

Plaintiff,
v.
LINKEDIN CORPORATION, a Delaware
Corporation,

Courtroom:
Judge:
Trial Date:

Defendant.

4, 5th Floor
Hon. Edward J. Davila
None Set

26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL.
(CASE NO. 12-CV-3088-EJD)

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

1.

1

This Stipulation is entered into by and among plaintiff Katie Szpyrka (“Plaintiff”) and

2

defendant LinkedIn Corporation (“LinkedIn”) (Plaintiff and LinkedIn collectively the “Parties”),

3

by and through their respective counsel.

4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12

WHEREAS Plaintiff filed a Complaint in the above-entitled action in the United States
District Court for the Northern District of California on June 15, 2012;
WHEREAS a Waiver of the Service of Summons form, executed by LinkedIn’s counsel,
has been filed;
WHEREAS the current deadline for LinkedIn to answer, move, or otherwise respond to
the Complaint is August 14, 2012 (60 days from the date on which Plaintiffs sent the request for
waiver of service to LinkedIn);
WHEREAS, by Clerks’ Notice, the initial Case Management Conference in this action is
currently set for August 24, 2012;

13

WHEREAS the Parties, in a separate filing, have jointly requested that the Court

14

reschedule the initial Case Management Conference from August 24, 2012 to August 31, 2012;

15

WHEREAS under Civil Local Rule 6-1(a), parties may stipulate in writing, without a

16

court order, to extend the time within which to answer or otherwise respond to a complaint;

17

WHEREAS extending the date for LinkedIn to respond to the Complaint as set forth

18

below will not alter the date of any event or deadline already fixed by Court order;

19

NOW, THEREFORE, the Parties hereby stipulate and agree as follows:

20

LinkedIn’s deadline to answer, move, or otherwise respond to the Complaint in this

21

action—currently August 14, 2012—is extended to 45 days after the date of the forthcoming

22

initial Case Management Conference.

23

IT IS SO STIPULATED.

24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL.
(CASE NO. 12-CV-3088-EJD)

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

2.

1

Dated: August 13, 2012

2

COOLEY LLP

3

By: /s/ Matthew D. Brown
Matthew D. Brown (196972)

4

Attorneys for Defendant LINKEDIN CORP.

5
6
7
8
9

Dated: August 13, 2012

EDELSON MCGUIRE LLC
By: /s/ Ari J. Scharg
Ari J. Scharg
Attorneys for Plaintiff KATIE SZPYRKA

10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL.
(CASE NO. 12-CV-3088-EJD)

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

3.

1
2
3

ATTESTATION PURSUANT TO CIVIL LOCAL RULE 5-1(i)(3)
Pursuant to Civil Local Rule 5-1(i)(3), I, Matthew D. Brown, attest that concurrence in the
filing of this document has been obtained from each of the other signatories.

4
5

Dated: August 13, 2012

6

/s/ Matthew D. Brown
Matthew D. Brown

7
8

1052048/HN

9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
25
26
27
28
STIP. TO EXTEND TIME TO RESPOND TO COMPL.
(CASE NO. 12-CV-3088-EJD)

COOLEY LLP
ATTORNEYS AT LAW
SAN FRANCISCO

4.